On Monday 24 January 2005 18:47, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Note, gnupg-agent must be started prior to KMail and the _same_
> environment, see the gnupg-agent package for details.
> [maybe add a 2nd note on how to do this best, e.g. with a script
> in /etc/Xsession.d or KDE environment script]
shell
st, it should be sufficient to
manually get those packages and install them with dpkg or kpackage.
snip---
Currently, I have gnupg-agent and gpgsm installed which is sufficient, if you
do not use kwatchgnupg.
NOTHING needs to be recompiled anymore with KMail from
* Steffen Hein [Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:29:21 +0100]:
> On Friday 17 December 2004 13:05, you wrote:
> > Sure. but that isn't exactly useful for the purpose of this test
> > where it was desired to know whether non-official KDE apps from testing
> > would happily operate with KDE 3.3.1. Using k3b from
On Friday 17 December 2004 13:05, you wrote:
> Sure. but that isn't exactly useful for the purpose of this test
> where it was desired to know whether non-official KDE apps from testing
> would happily operate with KDE 3.3.1. Using k3b from unstable kinda
> defeats that purpose. Wouldn't you agree?
On Friday 17 December 2004 12:28, Steffen Hein wrote:
> On Friday 17 December 2004 00:02, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > k3b from testing is certainly highly unstable when used with KDE
> > from unstable, Has crashed on me 3 times in no time. I haven't even
> > gotten around to burning yet. Just pok
On Friday 17 December 2004 00:02, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> k3b from testing is certainly highly unstable when used with KDE from
> unstable, Has crashed on me 3 times in no time. I haven't even gotten
> around to burning yet. Just poking around in the various settings makes
> it crash. Output in
On Thursday 16 December 2004 21:51, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> On Friday 10 December 2004 18:16, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Frederik Dannemare [Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:05:32 +0100]:
>
[ snip ]
>
> I'll get to test k3b very soon. That is, as soon as I reboot - my cdr
> device has had serious problems w
Hi Lawrence,
[ CC'ing the lists (OT, yes - sorry), since I'm pretty sure that others
will mail me with the same answer you've given. ]
On Thursday 16 December 2004 22:47, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> New security code introduced in 2.6.8 broke some stuff with
> cdrecord/k3b.
>
> See www.k3b.org for m
On Friday 10 December 2004 18:16, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Frederik Dannemare [Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:05:32 +0100]:
[ snip ]
> > If "comprehensive partial upgrade testing" is doing something else,
> > please let us know so we can help in getting 3.3.x (I see 3.3.2 is
> > out upstream) shipped with Sar
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 04:53:28PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> But this will also list k3b, kaffeine, digikam, showimg, kvim, kile,
> gwenview (and probably other non-officials), since they all depend on
> kdelibs4.
Good point. So I now have Sid versions of all the unofficials, rather
On Monday 13 December 2004 17:18, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
[ snip ]
> since I'm "breaking" my current install anyway, by mixing packages
> from both testing and unstable, I cannot really bother with some
> extra packages installed in the process.
Bad English, I guess. What I meant was that I don'
On Monday 13 December 2004 17:02, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 16:53 schrieb Frederik Dannemare:
> > Any reason for not just doing "apt-get -t unstable install kde"?
>
> Very easy: it also installs lots of programs that you may not need
> (and who needs all KDE apps?).
By
Am Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 16:53 schrieb Frederik Dannemare:
> Any reason for not just doing "apt-get -t unstable install kde"?
Very easy: it also installs lots of programs that you may not need (and who
needs all KDE apps?).
HS
--
Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.h
On Sunday 12 December 2004 04:18, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó [Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:59:08 +0100]:
> > $ comm -12 <(apt-cache rdepends kdelibs4 | tr -d ' ' | sort) \
> > <(grep-status -Fstatus 'install ok installed' -ns package |
> > sort)
>
> bah, I'm *really* sorry for that crap
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 04:18:56AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> $ grep-status -ns package -Fdepends -e "kdelibs4|libarts1" \
> --and -Fstatus 'ok installed'
That worked really well, though I had to add the metapackages to the
install line by hand as aptitude wanted to remove
On Saturday 11 December 2004 21.58, Christopher Martin wrote:
[3.3.2]
> we would upload to a temporary repository (which would no doubt be
> announced on these lists).
experimental?
-- vbi
--
Beware of the FUD - know your enemies. This week
* Patent Law, and how it is currently abused. *
h
Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2004 03:51 schrieb Nick Leverton:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 02:14:58PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > we don't expect anything to break, but if it does, better knowing
> > *before* the transition happens, right?
>
> Is there an easy way to see what installed packages (
* Adeodato Simó [Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:59:08 +0100]:
> $ comm -12 <(apt-cache rdepends kdelibs4 | tr -d ' ' | sort) \
> <(grep-status -Fstatus 'install ok installed' -ns package | sort)
bah, I'm *really* sorry for that crap above.
$ grep-status -ns package -Fdepends -e "kdelibs4|libarts1
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:59:08AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> $ comm -12 <(apt-cache rdepends kdelibs4 | tr -d ' ' | sort) \
> <(grep-status -Fstatus 'install ok installed' -ns package | sort)
>
> other people may have more interesting suggestions as to how to
> upgrade only kde, I'
* Nick Leverton [Sun, 12 Dec 2004 02:51:46 +]:
> Is there an easy way to see what installed packages (but only the
> installed ones) require kdelibs4 ? It would simplify upgrading only KD
> to sid - unless someone has a better way :)
(I hate this, but there you go. Assumes $BASH.)
$ com
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 02:14:58PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> we don't expect anything to break, but if it does, better knowing
> *before* the transition happens, right?
Is there an easy way to see what installed packages (but only the
installed ones) require kdelibs4 ? It would simplify
On December 11, 2004 15:38, Doug Holland wrote:
> Any idea when we'll see KDE 3.3.2 in sid? I know that you guys are
> working hard on getting 3.3.1 into sarge, so I'm not expecting the
> packages instantly. Still. 3.3.2 has some nice fixes to khtml and
> konqueror that fix some rendering errors
Any idea when we'll see KDE 3.3.2 in sid? I know that you guys are working
hard on getting 3.3.1 into sarge, so I'm not expecting the packages
instantly. Still. 3.3.2 has some nice fixes to khtml and konqueror that fix
some rendering errors on certain web sites (gmail and Ars Technica forums,
* Mario Girlando [Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:07:40 +0100]:
> I've been running kde 3.3 on two different Sarge machines for about a month
> with no problems at all. I don't have everything installed, however, since
> kde is huge and I don't need all of it (particularly, I don't have kdeedu
> or kdetoys
Alle 14:14, sabato 11 dicembre 2004, Adeodato Simó ha scritto:
> * Benoit Mortier [Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:43:04 +0100]:
> > ok, what do we need to help you ? if a understand well, just install a
> > new sarge machine and install the kde 3.3 libs as soon as they appear
> > and test the programs ?
>
>
* Benoit Mortier [Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:43:04 +0100]:
> ok, what do we need to help you ? if a understand well, just install a new
> sarge machine and install the kde 3.3 libs as soon as they appear and test
> the programs ?
ideally, "as soon as they appear" ==> "now". that is, install a sarge
Le vendredi 10 Décembre 2004 18:16, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> otoh, it would be helpful to install kdelibs 3.3 in a sarge machine
> (or the full kde 3.3, even better) and test that the rest of
> non-official applications (e.g., k3b, kaffeine, digikam, showimg,
> kvim, kile, gwenview, konse
* Frederik Dannemare [Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:05:32 +0100]:
> On Friday 10 December 2004 11:53, Daniel Rode wrote:
> > is there a chance that kde 3.3.x will be avaliable for Debian Sarge?
> > As I can see there are only few (three?) bugs and two of them seems
> > to be not too s
28 matches
Mail list logo
