On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:56:48AM +, John Gay wrote:
(sorry for the delay; this message was lost in the mists of time).
> So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to revert qt back to the
> old libpng2 rather than keep it at the new one, which Daniel is planning to
> re-compile the res
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:00:39 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:15:00AM +, Nick wrote:
>> Can Chris or anyone else who Understands please give a corresponding
>> comment about testing ?I believe the standard wisdom is that
>> testing KDE has been less useful than unstab
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:15:00AM +, Nick wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:42:55 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> >> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
> >
> >> > Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for
> >> > buildds to catch up)
> >
> >After talkin
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:42:55 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
>> > Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for
>> > buildds to catch up)
>
>After talking to one of the buildd guys I think the estimate will probably
>be bum
After talking to one of the buildd guys I think the estimate will probably
be bumped out to about 14 days, due to the time to build some of the key
packages.
Chris
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:07:48AM +, John Gay wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Hopefully unstab
On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for
> buildds to catch up).
Thanks for the estimate! I'll be sure to hold you to that : )
And thanks for the detailed explanation of where you and Daniel are going
from here! A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 January 2002 6:56 am, John Gay wrote:
...
> At the moment, I've only got problems with kmail missing icons. konq has
> its icon, unless I start it from the command line and I'm missing the KDE
> splash screen when I log in. I have not chec
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:56:48AM +, John Gay wrote:
> So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to revert qt back to the
> old libpng2 rather than keep it at the new one, which Daniel is planning to
> re-compile the rest of kde to?
Yes, I am sponsoring Daniel so I will be compiling kd
So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to revert qt back to the
old libpng2 rather than keep it at the new one, which Daniel is planning to
re-compile the rest of kde to?
This is just a temperary measure to fix the current majorly broken state of
KDE for the moment, right?
Are you and
9 matches
Mail list logo