Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-11 Thread Derek Broughton
On Thursday 10 March 2005 15:13, Alejandro Exojo wrote: > El Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 16:02, Derek Broughton escribió: > > No.  _Most_ of them are there.  My netcom.ca address isn't, and I've > > asked here at least three times where it _really_ is, and can't get a > > response from any of the d

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-11 Thread Derek Broughton
On Thursday 10 March 2005 11:38, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:02, Derek Broughton wrote: > > Not as far as I can tell. It _still_ remembers my netcom.ca address, > > which is three years out of date > > > > > > AFAIK, kmail takes the adresses from your sentbox or sth like that,

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-11 Thread Derek Broughton
On Thursday 10 March 2005 11:35, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 16:02 schrieb Derek Broughton: > > No.  _Most_ of them are there.  My netcom.ca address isn't, and I've > > asked here at least three times where it _really_ is, and can't get a > > response from any of the devel

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 16:02, Derek Broughton escribió: > No.  _Most_ of them are there.  My netcom.ca address isn't, and I've asked > here at least three times where it _really_ is, and can't get a response > from any of the developers.  I can't find it anywhere on the system (except > in

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Liz Young
Hi Greg, On Thu March 10 2005 08:57 am, Greg Madden wrote: > I edited the ~/kmailrc file, but when I restart kmail the offending > address Âre-appears in recent-addresses. I have had to do this a couple of times. Make sure kmail/kontact is not running when you edit the kmailrc file, or else it w

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 17:57 schrieb Greg Madden: > I don't know what Hendrik Sattler means by "Right click on the field and > choose the last item in the context menu," this sounds promising. Translated back it would be "Edit recently used addresses..." and appears in the context menu of t

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Pierre Habouzit
> I don't know what Hendrik Sattler means by "Right click on the field > and choose the last item in the context menu," this sounds promising. just do it, the last item is 'Edit recent adress' (more or less, wording may be different) -- ÂOÂ Pierre Habouzit ÂÂO OOO

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Greg Madden
On Thursday 10 March 2005 02:11 am, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 10 March 2005 09:05, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > if yes, then, the next mail with it corrected will be in recent > > adress, and the bad one will disapear. > > Thinking back from behavior I'm seeing in kmail, I think it remembers > t

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 16:02 schrieb Derek Broughton: > No.  _Most_ of them are there.  My netcom.ca address isn't, and I've asked > here at least three times where it _really_ is, and can't get a response > from any of the developers.  I can't find it anywhere on the system (except > in emai

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:02, Derek Broughton wrote: > Not as far as I can tell. It _still_ remembers my netcom.ca address, > which is three years out of date > > > > AFAIK, kmail takes the adresses from your sentbox or sth like that, > > > so try to delete the mails with the bad adress in it a

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Derek Broughton
On Thursday 10 March 2005 07:11, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 10 March 2005 09:05, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > if yes, then, the next mail with it corrected will be in recent adress, > > and the bad one will disapear. Hard to imagine how that could happen - how would it know it's replacing a wro

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday 10 March 2005 12:21, LeVA wrote: > 2005. március 10. 12:11, > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -> debian-kde@lists.debian.org,Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Thursday 10 March 2005 09:05, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > if yes, then, the next mail with it corrected will be in rece

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread LeVA
2005. március 10. 12:11, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> debian-kde@lists.debian.org,Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday 10 March 2005 09:05, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > if yes, then, the next mail with it corrected will be in recent adress, > > and the bad one will disapear. > > Thinki

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 10 March 2005 09:05, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > if yes, then, the next mail with it corrected will be in recent adress, > and the bad one will disapear. Thinking back from behavior I'm seeing in kmail, I think it remembers the last X addresses you used. So an incorrect address will disa

Re: kamil recent-address's

2005-03-10 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Jeu 10 Mars 2005 03:33, Greg Madden a écrit : > KDE 3.3.2, Sarge. > > A feature of kmail composer is a drop down list of recent addresses > when typing in the TO: field. The address in recent-addresses is > wrong, and I cant's find a way to change the address. There is not a > recent-address gro