El Lunes 11 Mayo 2009 20:06:38 Raúl Sánchez Siles escribió:
>
> Great news!
>
> Thanks a lot Modestas.
Indeed. :).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
El Lunes 11 Mayo 2009, Modestas Vainius escribió:
> Hello,
>
> On 2009 m. May 10 d., Sunday 23:28:28 Valentin Pavlyuchenko wrote:
> > Well, what about now?
> > I see both qtscript and taglib-extras in repos.
>
> amarok_2.0.96-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
>
> 2.1 Beta 2. Enjoy.
Great news!
Thanks a l
Hello,
On 2009 m. May 10 d., Sunday 23:28:28 Valentin Pavlyuchenko wrote:
> Well, what about now?
> I see both qtscript and taglib-extras in repos.
amarok_2.0.96-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
2.1 Beta 2. Enjoy.
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
On 2009 m. May 10 d., Sunday 23:28:28 Valentin Pavlyuchenko wrote:
> Well, what about now?
> I see both qtscript and taglib-extras in repos.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528082
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Well, what about now?
I see both qtscript and taglib-extras in repos.
2009/4/22 Modestas Vainius
> Hello,
>
> On 2009 m. April 22 d., Wednesday 11:11:18 Andrea Cavaliero wrote:
> > is it possible to have a package of amarok 2.1 beta1 in experimental?
> I've
> > seen that there are already older
El Viernes 24 Abril 2009 00:25:23 Cassiano Leal escribió:
> Not until eight or nine moons have passed! :D
Nine moons for a package to be available for use? Like a human pregancy more or
less... Seems reasonable. I just hope the birth to be less painful for
mantainers, XD.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Manolete, ese artista... <
variosin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (...)
> I understand some mantainers may get upset since they are working to make
> packages just to see how these, or their dependences, wait in NEW, till the
> next moon,
(...)
Not until eight or nine m
El Jueves 23 Abril 2009 00:04:52 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escribió:
> The NEW queue serves an important purpose. It it the last line of defense
> Debian/SPI has against accidentally violating copyright by distributing
> something incorrectly. IIRC, packages only have to go through the queue
> on
Hello,
On 2009 m. April 23 d., Thursday 01:04:52 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> The NEW queue serves an important purpose. It it the last line of defense
> Debian/SPI has against accidentally violating copyright by distributing
> something incorrectly. IIRC, packages only have to go through the
In <20090438.30351.variosin...@gmail.com>, Manolete, ese artista...
wrote:
>El Miércoles 22 Abril 2009 19:12:26 Modestas Vainius escribió:
>> Everybody knows such delays are bad but ftp-masters have always kept and
>> keep doing it anyway (with quite rare exceptions). And it has been like
>> t
Hi.
El Miércoles 22 Abril 2009 19:12:26 Modestas Vainius escribió:
> Everybody knows such delays are bad but ftp-masters have always kept and keep
> doing it anyway (with quite rare exceptions). And it has been like this for
> years. There even used to be no publically available NEW queue listi
Hello,
On 2009 m. April 22 d., Wednesday 18:05:52 Manolete, ese artista... wrote:
> Is there any reason for this? I mean, a lot of work, few ftp masters, or
> something similar, or they are just unaware they are blocking the progress
> of KDE for Debian?
Everybody knows such delays are bad but ftp
El Miércoles 22 Abril 2009 10:54:19 Modestas Vainius escribió:
> It is not possible because its dependencies (qtscriptgenerator and taglib-
> extras) are waiting in NEW queue[1] for almost 2 months now.
Is there any reason for this? I mean, a lot of work, few ftp masters, or
something similar, o
Hello,
On 2009 m. April 22 d., Wednesday 11:11:18 Andrea Cavaliero wrote:
> is it possible to have a package of amarok 2.1 beta1 in experimental? I've
> seen that there are already older snapshots but i was waiting for the beta
> to try it out.
It is not possible because its dependencies (qtscript
14 matches
Mail list logo
