On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:17:59AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
(apologies for the delay, this got lost in the mists of time)
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:54:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > I would suggest that the consensus opinion of the last week is that
> > > the partial upgrade breakage f
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:54:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I don't understand why you say that.
> Let me clarify. This is not something that can be done *cleanly* with
> bugs, nor something that I have any desire to do with bugs.
Bugs aren't a mechanism, they're a communications tool. If
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:43:05PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > This is not something that can be done with bugs,
>
> I don't understand why you say that.
Let me clarify. This is not something that can be done *cleanly* wi
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:43:05PM -0500, steve wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > However, if the rebuilt libqt2 gets into testing before the rebuilt
> > > KDE apps, then the latter will suddenly break for everyone using the
> > > "testing" distribution.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The reason I'm writing here is that I would like to see the problem
> > packages (libqt2 and related kde apps) stay out of TESTING until
> > this issue i
Excuse the LookOut! Express's crapping up of the message. Real mail client
tomorrow, yeah!
- Original Message -
From: "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME
6 matches
Mail list logo
