Re: Question about Qt exception handling

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday 05 December 2005 17:27, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote: > Kevin Krammer a écrit : > > On Thursday 01 December 2005 17:23, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote: > >>Well, I don't understand why ! The default options are *with* exception > >>support Then, I already tried to compile debian

Re: Question about Qt exception handling

2005-12-05 Thread Pierre Barbier de Reuille
Kevin Krammer a écrit : > On Thursday 01 December 2005 17:23, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote: > > >>Well, I don't understand why ! The default options are *with* exception >>support Then, I already tried to compile debian packages with >>exception support and it just works very fine ! I do

Re: Question about Qt exception handling

2005-12-01 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday 01 December 2005 17:23, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote: > Well, I don't understand why ! The default options are *with* exception > support Then, I already tried to compile debian packages with > exception support and it just works very fine ! I don't see any reason > to *explici

Re: Question about Qt exception handling

2005-12-01 Thread Pierre Barbier de Reuille
Kevin Krammer a écrit : > On Thursday 01 December 2005 14:30, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>I don't really know if this is the good channel to talk about that, but >>I did not find any better one ! >> >>My question is : is there a reason why the libqt was always compiled >>with

Re: Question about Qt exception handling

2005-12-01 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday 01 December 2005 14:30, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote: > Hello, > > I don't really know if this is the good channel to talk about that, but > I did not find any better one ! > > My question is : is there a reason why the libqt was always compiled > without exception handling ? I would