Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming [task manager bug]

2025-03-07 Thread Shmerl
I just tested it, and it works, but looks like Plasma is still affected by the bug that's not fixed in 6.8.2 but has an upstream commit fix: * https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491100 * https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtwayland/+/623667 It would be nice if Debian maintainers could pick

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:10 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: ... > BAD timing. > adduser (3.144) unstable; urgency=medium [ Matt Barry ] * Clean up system account logic. Thanks to Michael Musenbrock and Vincent Lefevre (Closes: #1099470, #1099477) -- Marc Haber Tue, 04 Mar 2025 20:57:13 +0100

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 9:46 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Sedat Dilek - 04.03.25, 21:32:59 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM Martin Steigerwald > wrote: > > > Martin Steigerwald - 01.03.25, 12:49:06 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit: > […] > > > One machine updated ju

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Sedat Dilek - 04.03.25, 21:32:59 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Martin Steigerwald - 01.03.25, 12:49:06 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit: […] > > One machine updated just nicely. Others will follow, but more in the > > late afternoon time.

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Martin Steigerwald - 01.03.25, 12:49:06 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit: > > Idea is to get in Qt 6.8.2 quickly, but it will take some time for the > > build servers to do their job. Also there are dependencies which need to > > be rebuilt

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Martin Steigerwald - 01.03.25, 12:49:06 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit: > Idea is to get in Qt 6.8.2 quickly, but it will take some time for the > build servers to do their job. Also there are dependencies which need to > be rebuilt against new Qt. One machine updated just nicely. Others will follow

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 08:19:13AM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote: Are you saying that kwin-x11 is installable for you in sid? What version of kwin-x11 are you seeing in the archive right now? What version of libkdecorations3-6? I've already realized my mistake: kwin-x11 is installable for me be

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Antonio Russo
On 2025-03-02 07:53, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:48:08PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:12:31AM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote: src:kwin is uninstallable Not sure which binary packages you actually wanted to mention here but at least kwin-x

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:48:08PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:12:31AM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote: src:kwin is uninstallable Not sure which binary packages you actually wanted to mention here but at least kwin-x11 is installable. If you meant it's removed wh

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:12:31AM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote: src:kwin is uninstallable Not sure which binary packages you actually wanted to mention here but at least kwin-x11 is installable. because it needs to be rebuilt [1] It doesn't say that though? Unless you run riscv64. in tur

Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Antonio Russo
On 2025-03-01 04:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Also there are dependencies which need to be rebuilt against new Qt. src:kwin is uninstallable because it needs to be rebuilt [1], but is failing to satisfy its build dependencies [2], in turn because src:layer-shell-q