Curt Howland wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
to gmane.linux.debian.user.kde:
> As has been suggested, this may be a function of the change from 3.5.5
> to 3.5.6 in experimental, in which case as soon as I see Kmail
> updated again I'll be sure to retry and utilize this function.
That
On Friday 09 March 2007 13:57:08 Curt Howland wrote:
> I have been taken to task for "breaking threads" in a mailing list,
> because I receive the digest. Nothing I have found to do has been
> able to reply to a particular encapsulated message, thus preserving
> the "in-reply-to" header entry.
>
>
Le Sunday 11 March 2007, Paul Johnson(Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
a écrit:
Hello,
> It works in the current kmail in sid (Debian package
^
> 4:3.5.6.dfsg.1-1). The link I'm referring to appears at the very
^^
> top of an encapsulated
Curt Howland wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2007 19:04, Paul Johnson was heard to say:
>> It works in the current kmail in sid (Debian package
>> 4:3.5.6.dfsg.1-1). The link I'm referring to appears at the very
>> top of an encapsulated message above said message's headers.
>
> Yes, I know the bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 10 March 2007 19:04, Paul Johnson was heard to say:
> It works in the current kmail in sid (Debian package
> 4:3.5.6.dfsg.1-1). The link I'm referring to appears at the very
> top of an encapsulated message above said message's headers.
Y
Curt Howland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 09 March 2007 19:36, Paul Johnson was heard to say:
>> Click on the words "Encapsulated Message" to open the message in
>> it's own window. From there, you can reply/forward/view
>> headers/whatever as if you rec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 09 March 2007 19:36, Paul Johnson was heard to say:
> Click on the words "Encapsulated Message" to open the message in
> it's own window. From there, you can reply/forward/view
> headers/whatever as if you received it individually.
Ya know,
Curt Howland wrote:
> I have been taken to task for "breaking threads" in a mailing list,
> because I receive the digest. Nothing I have found to do has been
> able to reply to a particular encapsulated message, thus preserving
> the "in-reply-to" header entry.
Probably the best method isn't inte
8 matches
Mail list logo
