Re: KDEPIM issues (was: Re: Bugs bugs bugs)

2015-02-26 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 23. Februar 2015, 18:39:40 schrieb Volker Wysk: > Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2015, 16:13:10 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015, 16:32:33 schrieb Volker Wysk: > > > I've never used the experimental branch. When will the packages > > > migrate > > > to Unstable? > >

Re: KDEPIM issues (was: Re: Bugs bugs bugs)

2015-02-26 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2015-02-23, 18:39:40, Volker Wysk wrote: > Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2015, 16:13:10 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015, 16:32:33 schrieb Volker Wysk: > > And the Plasma 5 / Qt 5 port of KDEPIM is not yet ready as far as I am > > aware of. Even that will use the A

Re: KDEPIM issues (was: Re: Bugs bugs bugs)

2015-02-23 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey, > Well, that may not change *that much* with a newer version. 4.14.5 has > some bugs fixed, but I compiled kdepim-runtime and kdepimlibs 4.14.5 on top > of KDEPIM 4.14.2 as packages by debian and I still have most of the > issues. I also run akonadiserver 1.13 branch from git with the MySQL >

Re: KDEPIM issues (was: Re: Bugs bugs bugs)

2015-02-23 Thread Rainer Dorsch
On Sunday 22 February 2015 16:13:10 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > What could work quite well, and thats why I think for Munich it could > work, would be to have some decent (!) IMAP server like Dovecot (not > Exchange!) together with KMail. I have this setup here and indeed dovecot-imap, akonadi a

Re: KDEPIM issues (was: Re: Bugs bugs bugs)

2015-02-23 Thread Volker Wysk
Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2015, 16:13:10 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015, 16:32:33 schrieb Volker Wysk: > > I've never used the experimental branch. When will the packages migrate > > to Unstable? > > They won´t before Jessie release. > > Maybe KDEPIM 4.14.5 could make it