Re: KDE 3.1-beta2

2002-10-01 Thread Karolina Lindqvist
tisdagen den 1 oktober 2002 00.40 skrev Ben Burton: > Hmm, and taking a closer look the pixmaps *are* showing up in kword.files, > kspread.files, etc - so I suspect it's actually a case that they were just > left out of the koffice-debian.tar.gz that was uploaded. I only include the files I have

Re: KDE 3.1-beta2

2002-09-30 Thread Ben Burton
> The monolithic kdelibs I think is a > problem. Particularly if you want to install a single application on a > system that otherwise run another version of KDE, or that is not running > KDE at all. The same breaking up into smaller parts has already been done > with the "arts" package. This is

Re: KDE 3.1-beta2

2002-09-29 Thread Karolina Lindqvist
måndagen den 30 september 2002 11.28 skrev Ben Burton: > Well clearly the more critical places where the packages differ is with > kdelibs/etc; these core packages are not my responsibility and I guess if > there's coordination involved it'll need to be between you and calc. Yes, since I thought

Re: KDE 3.1-beta2

2002-09-29 Thread Ben Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Again I should add that I'm not trying to hassle you; you've done some wonderful work. > My opinion is quite clear. Get it out in coordination with KDE 3.1 > releases. Get it into unstable (or whatever), already beta-tested, when KDE > 3.1 final is

Re: KDE 3.1-beta2

2002-09-29 Thread Karolina Lindqvist
måndagen den 30 september 2002 02.30 skrev Ben Burton: > Hmm, just out of interest, what's the specific reason for having two > separate branches of KDE 3.1 packaging? I just took a look at the sources > and there do seem to be some non-trivial splits between your versions and > the CVS versions