Another option is to install qapt-deb-installer instead of gdebi, I think it
even has plasma notifications.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5159884.kWg
Em 05-04-2014 16:51, Torsten Grote escreveu:
On Saturday 05 April 2014 16:35:24 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
I understand that trying to educate is good, but, again, debian does not
have every software available to the world, packaged. For example, there
is no dropbox, or spotify.
You might want
On Saturday 05 April 2014 16:35:24 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
> I understand that trying to educate is good, but, again, debian does not
> have every software available to the world, packaged. For example, there
> is no dropbox, or spotify.
You might want to have a look at https://www.debian.or
Dnia 2014-04-05, o godz. 16:35:24
Fabio Rafael da Rosa napisał(a):
> The
> 'official' supported flash player is the PAPI version that comes with
> Chrome (not chromium) .
Take a look at pepperflashplugin-nonfree package.
Actually, it will download Google Chrome and rip flash out of it.
--
Bes
On Saturday 05 April 2014 16:35:24 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
> >> sudo aptitude install gdebi-kde
> >
> > Sudo doesn't work by default...
>
> Yes, that's another problem. It is enabled, if you don't provide a
> password for root at the debian installer (if I'm not mistaken), but,
> this is no
Em 05-04-2014 16:16, Facundo Aguilera escreveu:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
I do understand your point. I don't think the command line is difficult. I'm on
linux and debian for a long time already, I'm not talking about me. I'm talking
about the 'average' use
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
>
> I do understand your point. I don't think the command line is difficult. I'm
> on linux and debian for a long time already, I'm not talking about me. I'm
> talking about the 'average' user. They, on average, will _not_ want to lear
Em 05-04-2014 12:28, Diederik de Haas escreveu:
On Saturday 05 April 2014 12:16:50 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
Regarding the gdebi-kde, the 'option' to install it for enabling the
behavior , is not documented anywhere.
I guess that it should be added to a wiki page, right ?
How to install a deb
On Saturday 05 April 2014 12:16:50 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
> Regarding the gdebi-kde, the 'option' to install it for enabling the
> behavior , is not documented anywhere.
> I guess that it should be added to a wiki page, right ?
How to install a debian package is documented in LOTS of places
Em 05-04-2014 12:10, Erwan David escreveu:
Le 05/04/2014 17:04, Fabio Rafael da Rosa a écrit :
:). After some tries, I did find this package. What I'm questioning
here is the 'default' behavior, and the lack of documentation at the
wiki about how to enable it.
For me it makes sense. Installin
Em 05-04-2014 12:06, Diederik de Haas escreveu:
On Saturday 05 April 2014 11:47:47 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
But, that's not how the average user expects the system to
work. I do understand that there are risks on installing a package from
unknown source, but, disabling that will _not_ prevent
Le 05/04/2014 17:04, Fabio Rafael da Rosa a écrit :
> :). After some tries, I did find this package. What I'm questioning
> here is the 'default' behavior, and the lack of documentation at the
> wiki about how to enable it.
>
For me it makes sense. Installing a package independently of the system
On Saturday 05 April 2014 11:47:47 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
> But, that's not how the average user expects the system to
> work. I do understand that there are risks on installing a package from
> unknown source, but, disabling that will _not_ prevent people from doing
> it.
That's why I sai
Em 05-04-2014 11:54, Erwan David escreveu:
Le 05/04/2014 16:47, Fabio Rafael da Rosa a écrit :
Em 05-04-2014 11:18, Diederik de Haas escreveu:
On Saturday 05 April 2014 11:06:11 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
After the first boot, I did download google-chrome from the website,
and
tried to instal
Le 05/04/2014 16:47, Fabio Rafael da Rosa a écrit :
> Em 05-04-2014 11:18, Diederik de Haas escreveu:
>> On Saturday 05 April 2014 11:06:11 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
>>> After the first boot, I did download google-chrome from the website,
>>> and
>>> tried to install it, without success.
>>> I di
Em 05-04-2014 11:18, Diederik de Haas escreveu:
On Saturday 05 April 2014 11:06:11 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
After the first boot, I did download google-chrome from the website, and
tried to install it, without success.
I did check that, for being able to install something from the UI, with
a
On Saturday 05 April 2014 11:06:11 Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote:
> After the first boot, I did download google-chrome from the website, and
> tried to install it, without success.
> I did check that, for being able to install something from the UI, with
> a double click, I must install gdebi-kde.
>
Am 06.07.2012 10:02, schrieb David Jarvie:
On Monday 02 July 2012 16:20:27 chymian wrote:
I followed your advice and opened up a new thread:
http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=106640
Just a word of warning - many KDE developers do not read forums. Unless you
know that the forum you pos
On Monday 02 July 2012 16:20:27 chymian wrote:
> I followed your advice and opened up a new thread:
>
> http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=106640
Just a word of warning - many KDE developers do not read forums. Unless you
know that the forum you posted to is read by developers, you should
On 23/06/2012 at 19:03, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Bugs that aren't packaging bugs, we prefer them going to upstream. Else
> we end up being proxies for questions from upstream to you and replies
Thanks for your quick reply.
I will report to upstream, then.
--
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski
--
To
On 2012-06-23, Miros??aw Zalewski wrote:
> So, if I happen to find any bugs which I believe are KDE SC related, should I
> file them to Debian BTS or should I go to upstream?
Bugs that aren't packaging bugs, we prefer them going to upstream. Else
we end up being proxies for questions from upstre
On 2012-06-22 10:14, David Jarvie wrote:
> Good, I'm glad you got it sorted out. There is always a potential problem,
> in KAlarm as in other applications, if you try to use configuration or
> data files when stepping back to an older version of the application.
> Your experience makes me wonder
On Thu, June 21, 2012 9:29 pm, Andreas v. Heydwolff wrote:
> On 2012-06-21 01:10, David Jarvie wrote:
>
>> That package is for use with kdepim 4.4. I'm confused as to which
>> package versions you are using, since KAlarm 4.4 is not able to use
>> Akonadi - Akonadi resources for KAlarm were only imp
On 2012-06-21 01:10, David Jarvie wrote:
> That package is for use with kdepim 4.4. I'm confused as to which
> package versions you are using, since KAlarm 4.4 is not able to use
> Akonadi - Akonadi resources for KAlarm were only implemented in
> kdepim 4.8. Earlier versions of KAlarm do not use A
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 18:05:04 Andreas v. Heydwolff wrote:
> On 2012-06-20 17:47, David Jarvie wrote:
> > On Wed, June 20, 2012 12:54 am, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> >> Andreas v. Heydwolff wrote:
> >>
> You are missing Kalarm akonadi resources.
> >>>
> >>> Indeed they are not installed. I am
Hello,
On trečiadienis 14 Spalis 2009 08:06:19 Cae Sium wrote:
> Wondering if there is any chance that besides the Debian KDE CD, there will
> be a Debian KDE-minimal CD.
> Believe this will be very attractive to many KDE users.
Squeeze KDE CD will install kde-standard. It is a lot smaller set of
Le Tuesday 27 May 2008 14:55:16 David Baron, vous avez écrit :
> Plasma was not updated to my knowledge, still using version on
> experimental.
>
> After a not-infrequent plasma crash while playing with widgets, the
> behavior of the panel changed from the Pager, panel icons/widgets on right
> half
On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:08:52 Wolfgang Mader wrote:
> > Another thing: most of the time, I don't have background with kdm.
>
> dito
>
> Wolfgang
I have not had the crash but I do lack the background. Problem is apparently
that kdm does not request a repaint when it comes up (or does not inva
>
> Another thing: most of the time, I don't have background with kdm.
dito
Wolfgang
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 12:03:07 cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
> > I do not kow if this is correlated but I also do have strange behaviour
> > in kde 4.devel. (kde 4.0.70 -- svn version)
> >
> > At boot time kdm is not comming up; if I log
D.ailleurs, avec dix chaudi.res ayant dix fourneaux chacune, soit cent feux .
conduire, ce bataillon .tait occup. nuit et jour. Quant . l..quipage proprement
dit du steamship, ma.tres, quartiers-ma.tres, gabiers, timoniers et mousses, il
comprenait environ cent hommes. De plus, deux cents stewar
Dominique Devriese writes:
domi> Daniel Stone writes:
Daniel> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:09:11PM +0100, David Pye wrote:
>>> While perhaps related to debian, and packaging, I'd like to add
>>> that third party KDE-based apps also seem unable to locate other
>>> files, such as .ui files,
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> For reference, I sent a patch to Daniel Stone that adds this target,
> and he told me he would be committing this. However, Stephan Kulow
> told me he would not put any distribution-specific code in
> acinclude.m4.in, so it does
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Ralf> I wouldn't change anything on the current setup - you can
> Ralf> install the packages but you can also, alongside, compile your
> Ralf> own CVS and applications into /usr/local (did that here and it
> Ralf> works f
Ralf Nolden writes:
Ralf> On Freitag, 16. Mai 2003 10:57, Chris Cheney wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:41:00AM +0200, Dominique Devriese
>> wrote:
>> > "tell your users to use the option to ./configure", you mean, I
>> > guess, which is why I don't like this option too much..
>> >
On Freitag, 16. Mai 2003 10:57, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:41:00AM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > "tell your users to use the option to ./configure", you mean, I
> > guess, which is why I don't like this option too much..
> >
> > Do you think there is any way to make ./c
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 03:46:01AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Also I have a gripe about KStandardDirs in general. It forces me to put
> crappy /usr/share/config fixup symlink to /etc/kde3 in Debian since it
> is based off --prefix. IMHO it should use the kderc file like the other
> function (forg
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:41:00AM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> "tell your users to use the option to ./configure", you mean, I
> guess, which is why I don't like this option too much..
>
> Do you think there is any way to make ./configure auto-detect this ?
> Could perhaps debianrules get a
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:40:56PM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Paul Cupis writes:
>
> Paul> On Wednesday 14 May 2003 14:41, Dominique Devriese
> Paul> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> No, that's not the problem. The problem is in the patch
> >> kdelibs.dirs.patch that only Debian
Paul Cupis writes:
Paul> On Wednesday 14 May 2003 14:41, Dominique Devriese
Paul> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, that's not the problem. The problem is in the patch
>> kdelibs.dirs.patch that only Debian applies. It makes it such
>> that for any given prefix ( whether it is /usr, /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 14:41, Dominique Devriese
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, that's not the problem. The problem is in the patch
> kdelibs.dirs.patch that only Debian applies. It makes it such that
> for any given prefix ( whether it is /usr
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 08:47, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Hmm.. rereading your email, why can't the packages just set
> KDEDIRS ( or the corresponding option ) to
> "/usr/:/usr/local:/usr/local/kde", so that users won't have to deal
> with problems like the above ?
Agree, it's possible to insta
Dominique Devriese writes:
domi> However, the damage is probably already done, since all
domi> previous KDE versions in Debian have had the patch applied, so
domi> I'm going to make a patch for the KDE build system that makes
domi> it install HTML documentation in $prefix/share/doc/kde/HTM
Ralf Nolden writes:
Ralf> export kde_htmldir=/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML
>> >> I suppose I have to tell all Debian users to export this
>> before >> configuring then ?
>>
Ralf> Then please turn to debian-devel and ask there to change their
Ralf> standards to allow a global HTML directory
On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2003 08:34, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Ralf Nolden writes:
>
>
> I know, I've been playing around with creating a Debian package, but
> this is not what I'm talking about..
>
> Ralf> export kde_htmldir=/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML
>
> I suppose I have to tell all Debian users to
Daniel Stone writes:
>> >> This patch breaks the documentation of all third party KDE >>
>> applications, since these packages ( at least those that use the
>> >> standard KDE build system to install docs ), install their >>
>> documentation in "$prefix/share/doc/HTML", and this is never >
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:41:00AM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Daniel Stone writes:
> Daniel> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:39:02PM +0200, Dominique Devriese
> Daniel> wrote:
> >> The only Debian kdelibs patch,
> >> kdelibs/debian/patches/kdelibs.dirs.diff changes KGlobals to only
> >
Daniel Stone writes:
Daniel> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:09:11PM +0100, David Pye wrote:
>> While perhaps related to debian, and packaging, I'd like to add
>> that third party KDE-based apps also seem unable to locate other
>> files, such as .ui files, which locate themselves in
>> /usr/l
Daniel Stone writes:
Daniel> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:39:02PM +0200, Dominique Devriese
Daniel> wrote:
>> The only Debian kdelibs patch,
>> kdelibs/debian/patches/kdelibs.dirs.diff changes KGlobals to only
>> look for html resources that are named
>> "$prefix/share/doc/kde/HTML" ( an
Ralf Nolden writes:
Ralf> On Dienstag, 13. Mai 2003 19:39, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> ( i'm not sure if this is the debian kde development list, or if
>> it's more of a user list, so please refer me to the right place
>> if this isn't the place for this )
>>
>> The only
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:39:02PM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> The only Debian kdelibs patch,
> kdelibs/debian/patches/kdelibs.dirs.diff changes KGlobals to only look
> for html resources that are named "$prefix/share/doc/kde/HTML" ( and
> changes some cgi-bin search path too.. ).
And fai
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:09:11PM +0100, David Pye wrote:
> While perhaps related to debian, and packaging, I'd like to add that third
> party KDE-based apps also seem unable to locate other files, such as .ui
> files, which locate themselves in /usr/local/kde/share/apps/.
>
> Even though comp
On Dienstag, 13. Mai 2003 19:39, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ( i'm not sure if this is the debian kde development list, or if it's
> more of a user list, so please refer me to the right place if this
> isn't the place for this )
>
> The only Debian kdelibs patch,
> kdelibs/debian/patches/kd
David Pye writes:
David> Hi, While perhaps related to debian, and packaging, I'd like
David> to add that third party KDE-based apps also seem unable to
David> locate other files, such as .ui files, which locate
David> themselves in /usr/local/kde/share/apps/.
David> Even though compile
Hi,
While perhaps related to debian, and packaging, I'd like to add that third
party KDE-based apps also seem unable to locate other files, such as .ui
files, which locate themselves in /usr/local/kde/share/apps/.
Even though compiled locally, the apps themselves can't then find these
files.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-04-17 20:01, Eoin Campbell wrote:
> my keyboard is a 'pc105' uk layout keyboard
> the mouse is a HP Omnibook track pad, using the "ImPS/2" Protocol
> the xserver is XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1
> kde is version 3.1.1a
> and
> my kernel version is 2.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:49:36PM +0100, Eoin Campbell wrote:
> Normally it does work, but like i said the keyboard becomes completely
> unresponsive. can't restart X or switch to a terminal
Try upgrading X from 4.1 to 4.2 or 4.3, it sounds as if that may be
freezing since the rest of the machin
Normally it does work, but like i said the keyboard becomes completely
unresponsive. can't restart X or switch to a terminal
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:42:29PM +0100, David Pye stated:
> Does Ctrl+Alt+Backspace (Restart X-server) key sequence normally, work for
> you?
>
> David
> On Thursday 1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:12:39PM +0100, Bjoern Krombholz wrote:
> I just did an upgrade from 2.2.2 to 3.1 on sarge. It went smother than I
> expected. The only "problem" was knotes, its 2.2.2 version included a
> file moved to another (kdepim?) package in 3.1.
I've got 3.0.5 running on a Woody
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:36:38 +1100,
Daniel Stone wrote:
[...]
> IMHO no one person can maintain KDE, it should be split up, or
> delegated to a team. I tried once, failed dismally.
[...]
Ivan managed (or almost) to do it before some (?) users started
bitching about broken packages. One person c
> I just grepped the last four months of this list and you know how many
> instances of people.debian.org/~ccheney I find? ONE. This one.
I believe what you want to do is visit
http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/kdefoobar/debian and look
through the CVS logs. You'll see there's a lot more
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > This is an insult to Chris and everyone else working on KDE.
>
> I don't see it that way at all. Chris has 1,001 reasons why there's no
> packages available, while all around others are accomplishing i
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:24:33PM -0600, Brad Felmey scrawled:
> [reply OFF list]
Don't see why I should, since you're starting me.
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 15:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:06:49AM -0600, Brad Felmey scrawled:
> > > On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Sto
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:24:33PM -0600, Brad Felmey scrawled:
> [reply OFF list]
>
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 15:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:06:49AM -0600, Brad Felmey scrawled:
> > > On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > This is an insult to Chris a
[reply OFF list]
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 15:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:06:49AM -0600, Brad Felmey scrawled:
> > On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > This is an insult to Chris and everyone else working on KDE.
> >
> > I don't see it that way at all. Chri
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:10:13PM +, John Gay scrawled:
> On Tue 31 Dec 2002 17:06, Brad Felmey wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > This is an insult to Chris and everyone else working on KDE.
> >
> > I don't see it that way at all. Chris has 1,001 reasons why the
On Tue 31 Dec 2002 17:06, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > This is an insult to Chris and everyone else working on KDE.
>
> I don't see it that way at all. Chris has 1,001 reasons why there's no
> packages available, while all around others are accomplishing
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:06:49AM -0600, Brad Felmey scrawled:
> On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > This is an insult to Chris and everyone else working on KDE.
>
> I don't see it that way at all. Chris has 1,001 reasons why there's no
> packages available, while all around othe
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:15:47AM +0200, Jarno Elonen scrawled:
> > Chris Cheney has also put in a *lot* of work in his
> > official capacit as maintainer. He currently has packages available -
> > those are the ones that will be going into sid. "orth" also does
> > packages, basically from CVS HE
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> This is an insult to Chris and everyone else working on KDE.
I don't see it that way at all. Chris has 1,001 reasons why there's no
packages available, while all around others are accomplishing it.
Op maandag 30 december 2002 23:56, schreef Mark Purcell:
>
> Ralf, Karolina,
>
> I would just like to publically thank you for the work you have done with
> the KDE3 branch and your Debian packages. Your efforts in putting together
> the Debian KDE 3 packages has been greatly appreciated by many De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 31 Dec 2002 7:57 am, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Thus, again with the exception of Karolina's debs, the only work that is
> in theory duplicated is the actual compilation which really *has* to be
> duplicated since the various archives are built i
> My post isn't supposed to be an insult to anyone, rather a wake up call that
> we Debian & KDE have an alful lot of work going on in the front lines
> (debian-kde) and the back end (CVS HEAD, third party applications), but there
> is also an alwful lot of duplication going on which we can ill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I for one, and I'm sure there would be many others in the Debian
> > community, would be happy for either or both of you to become the
> > official Debian maintainers for KDE. Goodness knows you have
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:56:04AM +1100, Mark Purcell scrawled:
> I would just like to publically thank you for the work you have done with the
> KDE3 branch and your Debian packages. Your efforts in putting together the
> Debian KDE 3 packages has been greatly appreciated by many Debian users w
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:56, Mark Purcell wrote:
> I would just like to publically thank you for the work you have done with
> the KDE3 branch and your Debian packages. Your efforts in putting together
> the Debian KDE 3 packages has been greatly appreciated by many Debian users
> who would otherwise
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:19:56AM +1000, Nigel A. Chapman wrote:
> Hiyazzall,
>
> The list does not prefix its postings with the list name, eg.
> [debian-kde] (as in my subject line). This makes the postings very
> difficult to visually distinguish from the couple of dozen spam messages
> in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 October 2002 1:19 am, Nigel A. Chapman wrote:
> It has occurred to me that I could probably set up filtering in Mozilla
> to use the X-Loop (or some other) header as a send-to-a-folder criterion
> to get around this, but (1) there will
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:19:56AM +1000, Nigel A. Chapman wrote:
> The list does not prefix its postings with the list name, eg.
> [debian-kde] (as in my subject line). This makes the postings very
> difficult to visually distinguish from the couple of dozen spam messages
> in my inbox. I adm
Nigel A. Chapman wrote:
> It has occurred to me that I could probably set up filtering in Mozilla
> to use the X-Loop (or some other) header as a send-to-a-folder criterion
> to get around this, but (1) there will be lots and lots of potential
> users who wouldn't think of that, (2) no other list
[Chris Cheney]
> It may be possible for KDE 2.2.2 to be in woody by sunday (except for
> kdegraphics/kdeutils)
Not quite, but close. Output from grep-excuses:
* kdesdk (2.2.2-2 to 2.2.2-3)
+ Maintainer: Ben Burton
+ Too young, only 4 of 10 days old
+ Not consid
On Monday 11 March 2002 11:01, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> > On Sunday 10 March 2002 20:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > You want to play frozen-bubble.
> > > You really, really, want to play frozen-bubble.
>
> Argh, no, don't. For one it doesn't game over so you'll be desperately
> stuck
> On Sunday 10 March 2002 20:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > You want to play frozen-bubble.
> > You really, really, want to play frozen-bubble.
Argh, no, don't. For one it doesn't game over so you'll be desperately
stuck at level 50 trying to beat it. Second you can not set the level to
start at so e
Thanks Daniel. A few follow ups:
--- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:43:35PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As far as now installing kde for i386 is concerned:
> >
> > You mention that kdegraphics and kdeutils need new uploads. Are there
> > currently o
On Sunday 10 March 2002 20:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> You want to play frozen-bubble.
> You really, really, want to play frozen-bubble.
now, there will be even less production from this box. looks nice.
thanks.
bob
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:43:35PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As far as now installing kde for i386 is concerned:
>
> You mention that kdegraphics and kdeutils need new uploads. Are there
> currently older versions of these packages that exist in the debian apt
> package
> servers that it
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wanna-build status for different archs
>
> kdebase - m68k dep-wait - mips building (stuck?)
> kdeadmin - m68k building (stuck?)
> kdemultimedia - m68k building (stuck?)
> kdenetwork- hppa building (stuck?) - m68k failed - sparc needs-b
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:06:48AM +, David Pashley wrote:
> Daniel Stone said, and I quote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:20:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > > I intend to adopt it with KDE 3, but I can do it earlier if
Daniel Stone said, and I quote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:20:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > Is anybody planning to adopt kde-i18n? It currently has its m
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:56:52PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > If it would help take load off you and you don't mind, I can QA-upload
> > kde-i18n with extra 'Replaces: kdelibs2g' fields where appropriate.
>
> Ivan's main KDE repo
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:20:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Is anybody planning to adopt kde-i18n? It currently has its maintainer
> > > field set to the QA grou
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:20:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Is anybody planning to adopt kde-i18n? It currently has its maintainer
> > > field set to the QA grou
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:20:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Is anybody planning to adopt kde-i18n? It currently has its maintainer
> > field set to the QA group, but I'm not sure it's something we should
> > really be touching -
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> Is anybody planning to adopt kde-i18n? It currently has its maintainer
> field set to the QA group, but I'm not sure it's something we should
> really be touching - it recently acquired a grave bug, too.
>
> There only seems to be an
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:40:51PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> kdelibs is in sid now and nearly built for all archs
> kdebase is in sid and still needs to be built for all archs
> kdeadmin has a bad build-dep and needs to be fixed
> kdegraphics has some issues daniels is looking at
> kdemultimedia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Daniel StoneMonday 04 March 2002 01:04 am]:
| kamera currently does not build with the new gphoto2, and versions built
| with the old do not link with the new. Can someone knowledgable please
| look at this? If I can't get it working in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Daniel StoneMonday 04 March 2002 01:04 am]:
| kamera currently does not build with the new gphoto2, and versions built
| with the old do not link with the new. Can someone knowledgable please
| look at this? If I can't get it working in t
Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> Will anything break if I update my x86 woody w/ KDE from unstable
> system now with the new KDE packages? I remember some talk about
> having to put them on hold ...
I have updated this morning w/o any errors or breakings, but I'm only
using some of the core KDE-pack
Chris
> If there is anything I missed let me know.
Umm .. I know this sounds a bit silly but I've had a look around the
Debian site and can't find the packages. Can anyone send me an
exact URL for download please ?
Thank you
--
Richard
www.sheflug.co.uk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 04 March 2002 01:40, Chris Cheney wrote:
> If there is anything I missed let me know.
Will anything break if I update my x86 woody w/ KDE from unstable
system now with the new KDE packages? I remember some talk about
having to put them on
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
