Re: Question regarding 4.2 packages in experimental

2009-02-27 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2009 12:20:19 schrieb Bernard Dudley: > Dietz Pröpper (di...@rotfl.franken.de) wrote: > > just out of curiosity (and because of some really, really annoying bugs > > in the current experimental packages), are there further 4.2 packages > > planned in experimental? > > > > Is

Re: Question regarding 4.2 packages in experimental

2009-02-27 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:20:19AM +, Bernard Dudley wrote: > Dietz Pröpper (di...@rotfl.franken.de) wrote: > > > > just out of curiosity (and because of some really, really annoying bugs > > in the current experimental packages), are there further 4.2 packages > > planned in experimental? > >

Re: Question regarding 4.2 packages in experimental

2009-02-27 Thread Bernard Dudley
Dietz Pröpper (di...@rotfl.franken.de) wrote: > > just out of curiosity (and because of some really, really annoying bugs > in the current experimental packages), are there further 4.2 packages > planned in experimental? > > Is there a way to report bugs against the experimental 4.2 packages? Do y

Question regarding 4.2 packages in experimental

2009-02-27 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Hi, just out of curiosity (and because of some really, really annoying bugs in the current experimental packages), are there further 4.2 packages planned in experimental? Is there a way to report bugs against the experimental 4.2 packages? regards Dietz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb