Re: Not a bug per se

2000-11-21 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
> You can generate your own ChangLog from CVS: > simply cd to kdenetwork/knode (or any other dir) and run > rcs2log -i 4 -R -h kde.org | fmt > myChangeLog > btw. knode has an uptodate ChangeLog I rather not do the rcs2log ..but your right about knode's changelog...along with alot of the other prog

Re: Not a bug per se

2000-11-21 Thread Stephan Voecks
Hi Ivan, > *If* there are upstream changelogs. For example..the Changelog for > kdelibs was last touched (or the last entry is dated) 1999-02-11. > > there's no point in it being there if it's useless. > > kdenetwork's is even worse... 1998-12-05. > > > Maybe not too important but I am using k

Re: Not a bug per se

2000-11-20 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
> Thanks for the quick response. I do want to say that I appreciate what > you and all the other package maintainers do, the message was in no way aimed > at slighting you or your work. I know you weren't... > I suppose the KDE web pages might have info on the individual packages? > I should look

Re: Not a bug per se

2000-11-19 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:09:41PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > *If* there are upstream changelogs. For example..the Changelog for > kdelibs was last touched (or the last entry is dated) 1999-02-11. > > there's no point in it being there if it's useless. > > kdenetwork's is even worse... 19

Re: Not a bug per se

2000-11-19 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
> Long story short, I recently took GNOME off my system and > went to a straight window manager, windowmaker, for when > I do run X. Now I do have some k apps installed, which > of course causes kdelibs3 etc.. to be on my system. I have > noticed that most, if not all,

Not a bug per se

2000-11-19 Thread Gordon Sadler
Ivan or others, I do not have a full KDE setup here, I was trying it out before it was added to Debian and I had various problems with the 2.0 etc... debs at that time. However, I have noticed that most programs seem to run much smoother as far as g