Re: KMail, pgp5 and gpg

2002-10-08 Thread Ingo Klöcker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 08 October 2002 12:20, Pablo de Vicente wrote: > El Martes 8 de Octubre de 2002 12:02, David Pashley escribió: > > On Tuesday 08 October 2002 10:49 am, Pablo de Vicente wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have run into some trouble with KMai

Re: KMail, pgp5 and gpg

2002-10-08 Thread Pablo de Vicente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Off-topic but for your interest to finish this thread: >... > Conclusion: > - This is off-topic, but how can I migrate my keys to GnuPG? > - Do I need to revoke my keys in the public keyserver and create new ones?. It is not necessary to revoke the

Re: KMail, pgp5 and gpg

2002-10-08 Thread Pablo de Vicente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- El Martes 8 de Octubre de 2002 12:02, David Pashley escribió: > On Tuesday 08 October 2002 10:49 am, Pablo de Vicente wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have run into some trouble with KMail, gpg and pgp5i. I will expose > > the case: > > > > I usually use pgp5i and h

Re: KMail, pgp5 and gpg

2002-10-08 Thread David Pashley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 08 October 2002 10:49 am, Pablo de Vicente wrote: > Hello, > > I have run into some trouble with KMail, gpg and pgp5i. I will expose the > case: > > I usually use pgp5i and have exported my public key to a keyserver. Before > doing that I

KMail, pgp5 and gpg

2002-10-08 Thread Pablo de Vicente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I have run into some trouble with KMail, gpg and pgp5i. I will expose the case: I usually use pgp5i and have exported my public key to a keyserver. Before doing that I checked that using PGP5i in different machines and with different identities KMail w