On 21/04/13 00:04, Modestas Vainius wrote:
>
> There is a way to do this - backports. It is an official service as of
> wheezy.
> However, I see the main problem here - noone is interested in actually doing
> the necessary work and invest their days/weeks of time to make it reality.
> Debian d
Hello,
On Friday 19 April 2013 13:48:04 Julian wrote:
> Its a high level application that runs on, what rightly should be, a
> well tested lower (dependency) levels of a stable core (debian base).
>
> So it has a lot to be thankful for when it comes to stability *out of
> the box* or are you sayi
On 18/04/13 22:32, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2013 m. of April 18 d., Thursday 04:04:01 Julian wrote:
>> release cycle rigmarole even if obsolete by the time it comes out of
>> freeze and is burned to 100's of blurays...no one wants 4.8 anymore.
>
> You know there are many people who
* Modestas Vainius [18-04-2013 15:34 EEST]:
> On 2013 m. of April 18 d., Thursday 04:04:01 Julian wrote:
> > release cycle rigmarole even if obsolete by the time it comes out of
> > freeze and is burned to 100's of blurays...no one wants 4.8 anymore.
> > People desperate for 4.10 are installing e
Hello,
On 2013 m. of April 18 d., Thursday 04:04:01 Julian wrote:
> release cycle rigmarole even if obsolete by the time it comes out of
> freeze and is burned to 100's of blurays...no one wants 4.8 anymore.
You know there are many people who do not care (or does not know) about
version at all.
> People desperate for 4.10 are installing experimental, which is crazy,
> experimental is the crucible of package pain and will always be that
> way, but it is unnecessary for alot of applications out there, including
> KDE.
>
> I'd rather test application bugs than package dependency bugs in
>
On 18/04/13 02:46, Markus Raab wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Julian wrote:
>> Having a stable and tested operating system and its core packages is
>> important and packages end up in stable that have gone through the
>> rigmarole.
>
> I fully agree!
>
>> Rolling releases of individual packages are everywh
Hello!
Julian wrote:
> Having a stable and tested operating system and its core packages is
> important and packages end up in stable that have gone through the
> rigmarole.
I fully agree!
> Rolling releases of individual packages are everywhere (downloadable
> .deb packages or little source rep
Hi
you are right, it's not upgrade from or to version in official debian, i
forgot that.
Just wanted to help with possible conflict, i didn't realise, that it won't
affect users, who use official packages
Libor
*On Friday 12 April 2013 14:48:17 Sune Vuorela wrote:*
*> On 2013-04-12, Libor Klep
On 2013-04-07, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Feel free to contact me privately. But note that that you need to have a
> good personal backup strategy.
Based on various feedback from the nice volunteers including Diane,
Andreas, Martin, Marco, Edward and Michael, the package is now in
experimental.
Good
* Libor Klepáč [12-04-2013 16:58 EEST]:
> Hello,
> I have build kdepim 4.10.2 packages from git, everything looks fine (i was
> building previous version of kdepim from git too, so no migration here)
> there is one conflict, it shows during upgrade
>
> --
> Preparing to replace kleopatra 4:4
On 2013-04-12, Libor Klepáč wrote:
Hi
> Preparing to replace kleopatra 4:4.8.3-0r0 (using
This is not a version we have been providing, so upgrading from it is on
your own.
> .../kleopatra_4.10.2-0r4_amd64.deb) ...
This is also not a package we have been providin so upgrading to it is
on you
Hello,
I have build kdepim 4.10.2 packages from git, everything looks fine (i was
building previous version of kdepim from git too, so no migration here)
there is one conflict, it shows during upgrade
--
Preparing to replace kleopatra 4:4.8.3-0r0 (using
.../kleopatra_4.10.2-0r4_amd64.deb) ..
On 2013-04-06, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Sune said:
>> the 'normal' experimental is where the action happens, but it happens
>> currently dripwise and not as a big chunk, as it makes stuff easier for
>> the developers. It includes prepearation for the modern kdepim.
>
> Is that the reason that if
On 07/04/13 06:54, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Sune said:
>> the 'normal' experimental is where the action happens, but it happens
>> currently dripwise and not as a big chunk, as it makes stuff easier for
>> the developers. It includes prepearation for the modern kdepim.
>
> Is that the reason that
Sune said:
> the 'normal' experimental is where the action happens, but it happens
> currently dripwise and not as a big chunk, as it makes stuff easier for
> the developers. It includes prepearation for the modern kdepim.
Is that the reason that if I want to do a full-upgrade, the 'solution' to t
Hello,
On Saturday 06 April 2013 12:51:13 Beojan Stanislaus wrote:
> > I wish there was some "Continuous integration" for KDE packaging which
> > took
> > the load of:
> >
> > * Package building and dependency management.
> > * Package uploading to development repository for testing.
> > * Automa
On Saturday April 06, 2013 12:07:57 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Friday 05 April 2013 08:42:54 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2013-04-05, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > What was the reason for qt-kde.debian.net then? From the page:
> > Some people thinks experimental is hard. Other people
Hello,
On Friday 05 April 2013 08:42:54 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2013-04-05, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > What was the reason for qt-kde.debian.net then? From the page:
> Some people thinks experimental is hard. Other people dislike doing the
> copyright-documentation that is required for the of
Am Friday 05 April 2013 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> Actual upgrade issues, like file overlaps and such - you are most
> welcome to report those. But remember your backup.
Hmm...I am hesitant to open a bug report here, because that seems so obvious
that I am almost sure that I miss something. Does any
On 2013-04-05, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> What was the reason for qt-kde.debian.net then? From the page:
Some people thinks experimental is hard. Other people dislike doing the
copyright-documentation that is required for the official archive. And
qt-kde.d.n also could allow people who isn't a D
scope here on the list, since it
basically is a users mailing list.
I continue looking forward to KDE SC 4.10 for Debian via official means.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 2013-04-05, Julian wrote:
> Were the servers down at qt-kde.debian.net? Sorry I'm just confused as
> to why 4.10 isn't there?
pushing things to qt-kde.debian.net is quite some extra work for
everybody, for example it is not hooked up to debian autobuilder
infrastructure, so it is basicalyl dou
On 04/04/13 21:54, David Baron wrote:
>
> I agree. I have two (count 'em) experimental snapshot sets of KDE, the KDE4.9
> on qt-kde.debian.net/debian and now the 4.10 on
> packages.siduction.org/kdenext. This is certainly not desirable and
> probably, the 4.10 shouild be copied or moved to th
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 01:44:08 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> > Hello Marin,
>
> Hi José,
>
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it se
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> Hello Marin,
Hi José,
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
> > José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
> >
> > Are any of these already in
On 2013-04-04, David Baron wrote:
> All siduction pakages upgraded today, saw -dev packages there as well.
Please take siduction support off this list.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 09:32:04 AM David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 02:08:00 AM José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > David Baron
> >
> > > Up and running, quite nicely
> > >
> > > My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
> > > Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over,
On 2013-04-04, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Thursday 04 April 2013 08:21:39 Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> The upgrade fails on my system, each time with kde-runtime-data.
>
> Please disregard my previous msg, since I was upgrading from the 'normal'
> experimental.
the 'normal' experimental is where
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 02:08:00 AM José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> David Baron
>
> > Up and running, quite nicely
> >
> > My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
> > Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over, new .kde.
> >
> > Found problem was actually the yaWP weather plasmoid.
On Thursday 04 April 2013 08:21:39 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> The upgrade fails on my system, each time with kde-runtime-data.
Please disregard my previous msg, since I was upgrading from the 'normal'
experimental.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
The upgrade fails on my system, each time with kde-runtime-data.
Details:
# aptitude safe-upgrade
Resolving dependencies...
The following packages will be upgraded:
kde-runtime-data
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
dolphin kate kde-baseapps kde-ba
José Manuel Santamaría Lema
> rebuilt against 4.8
ugh, I meant rebuilt against KDE workspaces 4.10.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
David Baron
> Up and running, quite nicely
>
> My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
> Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over, new .kde.
>
> Found problem was actually the yaWP weather plasmoid. When I put that back,
> crashed, so had to do some surgery on plasma-desktop-appletrc to get
Up and running, quite nicely
My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over, new .kde.
Found problem was actually the yaWP weather plasmoid. When I put that back,
crashed, so had to do some surgery on plasma-desktop-appletrc to get rid of
it.
--
To UNSU
José Manuel Santamaría Lema
> deb http://packages.siduction.org/kdenext experimental-snapshots
Oops, I actually meant:
deb http://packages.siduction.org/kdenext experimental-snapshots main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hello Marin,
Martin Steigerwald
> Hi!
>
> I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
> José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
>
> Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to build
> some during the free week after the coming we
Hi!
I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to build
some during the free week after the coming week.
Anyway, keep up the good work.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'H
38 matches
Mail list logo
