fredagen den 14 mars 2003 21.30 skrev John Gay:
> Wasn't there a comment on this list about Debian and Spaceballs that would
> be extremely appropriate to repeat just about now ;-)
As I did the mistake of prematurely building KDE 3.1.0, and then that version
was withdrawn, giving me a version nu
> > I still don't see KDE_3_1_1_RELEASE tags. I read that distributors got
> > the source on Tuesday and Debian is already shipping KDE 3.1.1 binary
> > packages.
>
> The packages are not final yet, there is still at least one compile
problem
> in Quanta to sort out.
>
> Debian does special stuff
torsdagen den 13 mars 2003 09.58 skrev Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Most of KDE 3.1.1 is now in Debian Sid.
>
> How can that be? 3.1.1 hasn't been tagged in CVS yet, as far as I can
> tell.
I found this is kde-core-devel:
fredagen den 14 mars 2003 13.16 sk
Le Vendredi 14 Mars 2003 01:45, Doug Holland a écrit :
> On Thursday 13 March 2003 08:27 am, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:30:44AM -0300, Michel Loos wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 11:09, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to workout if this was deliberately inconsi
On Thursday 13 March 2003 08:27 am, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:30:44AM -0300, Michel Loos wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 11:09, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> > > I'm trying to workout if this was deliberately inconsiderate or not.
> > > It's not like kde 3.1.1 has been officiall
> KDE 3.1.1 was released to packagers around
> tuesday, and that is what I am building from. If you want a
> working KDE at all in Debian stop complaining, I won't have a pc
> after sat for several weeks or more.
fair enough. I thought something like that might be the case.
c
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:09:28PM +, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> I'm trying to workout if this was deliberately inconsiderate or not.
> It's not like kde 3.1.1 has been officially released (as far as i can
> tell). What you have done is force people still using other packages
> to upgrade to
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:30:44AM -0300, Michel Loos wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 11:09, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> > I'm trying to workout if this was deliberately inconsiderate or not.
> > It's not like kde 3.1.1 has been officially released (as far as i can
> > tell). What you have done is f
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 11:09, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> I'm trying to workout if this was deliberately inconsiderate or not.
> It's not like kde 3.1.1 has been officially released (as far as i can
> tell). What you have done is force people still using other packages
> to upgrade to the incomplet
I'm trying to workout if this was deliberately inconsiderate or not.
It's not like kde 3.1.1 has been officially released (as far as i can
tell). What you have done is force people still using other packages
to upgrade to the incomplete sid ones if they want a package.
Grumble aside, can anyone
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Most of KDE 3.1.1 is now in Debian Sid.
How can that be? 3.1.1 hasn't been tagged in CVS yet, as far as I can
tell.
Regards,
Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mittwoch, 12. März 2003 21:20, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Most of KDE 3.1.1 is now in Debian Sid. Tomorrow kdemultimedia,
> kdenetwork, and kdepim will probably go in. It will not be installable
> until ftpadmin team adds the needed overrides for libvor
Thank you!
Not only for the status update but most of all for the work you put into the
packages!
--Felix
Most of KDE 3.1.1 is now in Debian Sid. Tomorrow kdemultimedia,
kdenetwork, and kdepim will probably go in. It will not be installable
until ftpadmin team adds the needed overrides for libvorbis0a though.
Chris
14 matches
Mail list logo
