On Monday 26 May 2003 10:48, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2003 11:22, David Goodenough wrote:
> > As an aside it is a shame that Debian does not have the concept of a
> > removal meta-package. [...]
> >
> > The alternative would be an option on apt-get remove which
On Friday 23 May 2003 11:22, David Goodenough wrote:
> As an aside it is a shame that Debian does not have the concept of a
> removal meta-package. [...]
> The alternative would be an option on apt-get remove which said to go down
> the tree and remove everything that this depends on that nothing
On Thursday 22 May 2003 23:59, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> On May 22, 2003 05:49 pm, Anders Ellenshxj Andersen wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 May 2003 23:20, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > You don't even have to install kdeprint at all then... so why are you?
> >
> > Ahh yes. kdebase depends on kdeprin
On Friday 23 May 2003 00:59, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> > Ahh yes. kdebase depends on kdeprint. I guess I can just uninstall the
> > lot..
> >
> > :)
>
> I've seen this issue raised all the time and thought it may be time to
> point out just what the kde metapackages do
Sorry. My bad for n
On May 22, 2003 05:49 pm, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2003 23:20, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > You don't even have to install kdeprint at all then... so why are you?
>
> Ahh yes. kdebase depends on kdeprint. I guess I can just uninstall the
> lot..
>
> :)
>
I've seen this issu
5 matches
Mail list logo
