On Wednesday 10 March 2004 18:39, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>>Should passwordless logins even be allowed?
> >>
> >>It's the admin who decides about them, so I don't see a problem.
> >
> > An analogy:
> > Should a Windows Admin be able to decide whether programs should
>
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>Should passwordless logins even be allowed?
>>
>>It's the admin who decides about them, so I don't see a problem.
>
> An analogy:
> Should a Windows Admin be able to decide whether programs should
> be able to run within MS Outlook? Sure it's conventient, but it's
> a *hug
David Pye writes:
> Thirdly, as kdm already does support it (excluding this minor
> regression, obviously!) why remove it? It's not like it's default,
> or even, arguably, easy to get working without editing files, so you
> can't enable it by mistake!
Actually, it's pretty easy to enable from kco
Hmm,
Note I said 'from KDM's point of view', not from the system's point of view :p
David
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:36, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 18:34, David Pye wrote:
> > It does work?
> >
> > Hmm, if so, then it m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 18:34, David Pye wrote:
> It does work?
>
> Hmm, if so, then it matters little to me which one is used.
>
> If I might ask, what's the difference, from KDM's point of view, as the
> user isn't prompted for a password in eithe
It does work?
Hmm, if so, then it matters little to me which one is used.
If I might ask, what's the difference, from KDM's point of view, as the user
isn't prompted for a password in either scenario, effectively making either
one a passwordless login...
David
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:26
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:22, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Firstly, my mother's PC - she is the only person who ever used it, and
> > can even access it, so why can't I allow her to autologin? It's one less
> > thing for her to worry about.
>
> That's an easy one to shoot down:
> http://www.ananova
Am Mittwoch, 10. März 2004 18:06 schrieb David Pye:
> > Should passwordless logins even be allowed?
>
> Absolutely - there are a number of scenarios where this behaviour is almost
> mandatory - I have two.
>
> Firstly, my mother's PC - she is the only person who ever used it, and can
> even access
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:06, David Pye wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 16:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > > Jeff Elkins writes:
[snip]
> > Should passwordless logins even be allowed?
>
> Absolutely - there are a number of scenarios where th
Ron Johnson writes:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>> Jeff Elkins writes:
>>
>> > Since upgrading to KDE3.2, kdm will no longer allow autologin,
>> > giving me an authentication failure. Is there a workaround for
>> > this?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a known problem. I hav
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:54:04AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > ** Passwordless logins don't work in kdm. This is a known problem
> >with a known fix. Replace the file /etc/pam.d/kdm-np with the one
> >from http://www.kde-debian.or
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:00, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> >> Jeff Elkins writes:
> >>
> >> > Since upgrading to KDE3.2, kdm will no longer allow autologin,
> >> > giving me an authentication failure. Is there a work
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 16:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > Jeff Elkins writes:
> > > Since upgrading to KDE3.2, kdm will no longer allow autologin,
> > > giving me an authentication failure. Is there a workaround for
> > > this?
> >
> > Hi,
>
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Jeff Elkins writes:
>
> > Since upgrading to KDE3.2, kdm will no longer allow autologin,
> > giving me an authentication failure. Is there a workaround for
> > this?
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a known problem. I have added the following text to
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 10:59 am, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>Jeff Elkins writes:
>> Since upgrading to KDE3.2, kdm will no longer allow autologin,
>> giving me an authentication failure. Is there a workaround for
>> this?
>
>Hi,
>
>This is a known problem. I have added the following text to
>h
Jeff Elkins writes:
> Since upgrading to KDE3.2, kdm will no longer allow autologin,
> giving me an authentication failure. Is there a workaround for
> this?
Hi,
This is a known problem. I have added the following text to
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKDE:
** Passwordless logins don't work i
16 matches
Mail list logo