On Tuesday 28 September 2004 2:09 am, Ian Eure wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this bug?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/273788
I don't see that problem here.
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 01:18 pm, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 7:42 pm, uwe Herion wrote:
> > Hallo
> > i make a dist-upgrade with unstable debian.
> > now i have kde 3.2:
> >
> > The new kde will not start.
> > An other displaymanger (icewm) starts.
> >
> > Can you help
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 05:14 am, Will Maier wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I finally made the switch to 3.2.1 last night (from the offical apt
> repository). I am thoroughly impressed: 3.2.1 looks wonderful. For some
> reason, however, programs seem to be loading/running slower since the
> upgrade.
>
> T
On Monday 06 October 2003 12:59, Antiphon wrote:
> It looks like you're misunderstanding me. I am only talking about when
> posting the archives on the Web, not via e-mail. With email, you'd be able
> to hit your reply just the same.
>
> While it is possible to get around encoding, since few sites
On Monday 06 October 2003 12:26, Antiphon wrote:
> Your example undermines your argument since no script could be written to
> get around all of the possible variations on the simple way I outlined.
>
> Good munging uses HTML entities to encode the relevant addresses so that
> each person's address
On Monday 06 October 2003 11:47, Antiphon wrote:
> Munging does not mean only removing the domain. It can be simply a matter
> of making [EMAIL PROTECTED] into joe at user dot or dot jp. That's not too
> hard for someone to figure out.
If I have to figure it out then I won't reply. I get thousands
On Monday 06 October 2003 09:19, Antiphon wrote:
> It is bad practice that the Debian listservs do not munge addresses. I
> realise that munging may not be implemented because people like to be able
> to respond to old threads privately but simply providing a mechanism as
> simple as spelling out
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 03:42 pm, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Dienstag, 8. April 2003 23:08 schrieb Patrick Dreker:
> > The X memory usage includes AGP mem. So if your card has 32 meg of RAM
> > you have to subtract this first. My X reports 290 m
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 01:42 pm, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> Second, It may not be the design goal to run on the lowest end stuff (like
> a system built out of Linux, Dietlibc, TinyX and twm or something :-) ),
> but I hope it isn't the goal of the kde project to become as big as Windows
> Xp or s
On Thursday 06 March 2003 12:03 pm, Casper Gielen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> KDE is using excesssive amounts of memory. Currently it uses over 800 mb
> after boot. Many KDE programms hover around the 80 megabytes (virtual)
> memory. After increasing my swapspace by
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Michael Schuerig wrote:
>
> The new (i.e. KDE 3.1) kdm takes an inordinately long time to startup on
> my system. After the switch to X, there's a delay of 15 to 30 seconds
> until the login screen (kdm greeter) appears. During this time, there's
> heavy activity on the disk.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any light in the tunnel for kde3 being uploaded in Sid some day,
> some year or so?
>
> I might be sounding a bit negative but haven't seen any progress or some
> sort of status from the maintaineres for some while now.. Is it still
> the
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
> Kpackage require librpm4 to run... :
>
> #apt-get remove librpm4 -s
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> kpackage librpm4 rpm
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
> $ su -c kpackage
> Password:
> kpackage: error while loading shared libraries: librpmbuild-4.0.3.so: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> librpmbuild-4.0.3.so is a part of librpm4, and guess what ? :
>
> # dpkg -l |grep librpm
> ii
When I start kpackage from kde 3.0.3 it complains about my not having
libdb.so.2. I did some searching and found that I needed libdb1-compat.
It would be good if kpackage could be built so it did not need this
library or if it could depend on libdb1-compat.
Designing and building web applications
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> o.k. one more thing:
>
> ldd /usr/bin/konqueror
>
> libpng.so.3 => /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 (0x40e31000)
>
> O.K. it is oviously linked against the wrong libpng. I am wondering
> that noone else is experiencing this problem. Or do I do something
Overall I think the KDE3 packages will be ready when they are ready and
will live up to the higher standard of packaging I have seen in the KDE2
for debian. I have used KDE on many dists and have found that the debian
packages tend to be a lot more stable and less buggy.
Overall if you think you c
17 matches
Mail list logo
