On Son, 20 Okt 2002, Chris Cheney wrote:
Hello,
> KDE 3.1 is expected to be released ~ Nov 4, if the transition isn't
> very close to happening I will upload it to unstable compiled against
> 2.95.
AFAIK KDE 3.1 will be released this week.
Is the statement still true?
thx.
--
Noèl Kö
On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Todd Charron wrote:
Hello,
> There seems to be a lot of back and forth here about what's happening
> with the GCC 3.2 migration and getting KDE into unstable. Is there
> anywhere that we can check the status of the migration and see what
> still needs to be done? (something
On Son, 20 Okt 2002, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> > uploads for experimental?
>
> That would be excellent if you would do that and quite suitable to
> upload the kde3.1x builds into unstable.
>
> It would also allow me to upload t
On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hello,
I have to fully agree that it makes alot of sense if we use
experimental for kde3 stuff. We have lost alot of time since
kde3 released in which we could fix our packages and could
work on packages which base on kde3.
> > Yes, something like this.
On Die, 08 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Just to let you know that I will *not* support anti-aliasing. You can
> use it, but don't expect me to urgently follow up on bug reports
> involving AA, as it causes problems such as #123264. If you report an AA
> bug, I'll probably downgrade its severity
On Mit, 02 Jan 2002, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > That's the problem; there is just no real solution besides a big
> > recompile.
>
> My question still remains. If we require a big recompile, when/ how are we
> going to bother to advise the maintainers of these packages? It has been
> stated that w
6 matches
Mail list logo
