Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The .desktop format is the proposed replacement for Debian's current menu
> file format, and in use by GNOME and KDE already. I would have thought the
> standard was required reading for even starting to discuss the next-gen menu
> stuff in Debian...
>
>
Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this thread could do with a good helping of spec-reading. :-)
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/VFolderDesktops.txt
I looked at that, and it's almost completely impossible to understand,
since it apparently assumes that you already know wh
Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > In other words, we should be using a unified Debian menu structure
> > > with appropriate tweaks for certain environments (and in
> > > particular, _not_ using the default Gnome/KDE menu structures).
> >
> > Yup.
>
> No... The point behind the vFolde
Luke Seubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Perhaps DD should _think_ about this issue -- for instance, if it has
> > to choose only one terminal program to display in a menu, it should
> > make an `environmentally aware' choice (KDE for KDE, Gnome for Gnome,
> > Joe's Wackyterm for everybody else
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:29:56PM -0400, Luke Seubert wrote:
> However, that does not mean that Debian Desktop should not care. KDE apps
> designed to run optimally under the KDE Desktop environment. Apps run
> better and faster because the libraries are already pre-loaded.
>
> So, if Desktop De
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not necessarily. When I use KDE, I largely want to use KDE apps. I
> personally think GNOME/KDE should offer their own menus, with a submenu
> in each category for "Non-{GNOME,KDE} Applications". I don't see a
> problem with this, i.e. how our KDE3 package
6 matches
Mail list logo
