Re: Fwd: Accepted digikam 2:1.6.0-1 (source all amd64)

2010-12-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 22:03:57 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder there Digikam 1.6.0 is hanging. I can't even seem to get the > source package to compile it myself: Martin, I was a bit naughty and uploaded based on KDE 4.5: - Requires packages from http://qt-kde.debian.

Re: digikam 1.4.0 (was: KDE SC 4.5.1 packages available)

2010-09-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 13 September 2010 02:22:53 Valerio Passini wrote: > I need some help. Trying to install your digikam packages fails because > of missing dependencies: > digikam asks for digikam-data 1.4.0-0.rc > kipi-plugins asks for kipi-plugins-common Valerio, Sorry, I forgot to upload those packa

digikam 1.4.0 (was: KDE SC 4.5.1 packages available)

2010-09-10 Thread Mark Purcell
All, I have uploaded the workinprogress digikam 1.4.0 to http://people.debian.org/~msp, built against the KDE SC 4.5 packages. I am happy for someone to upload these to qt-kde.d.n. The authoritive source for digikam debian packages remains kde-extras on svn.d.o. This allows digikam to functio

Re: KDE SC 4.5.1 packages available

2010-09-09 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 10 September 2010 05:57:14 George Kiagiadakis wrote: > Semi-official KDE SC 4.5.1 packages are now available at > http://qt-kde.debian.net/. Enjoy! Great work George. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] KMyMoney 4.5

2010-08-22 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 22 August 2010 11:05:20 Alvaro Soliverez wrote: > Is squeeze even going to have kde3 libs and some way to configure the > kde3 settings on it? Alvaro, Which kde3 libs do you see kmymoney 3.98 depending on? We have built it against lots of KDE 4.4 libs. I can't see it needing any from

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] KMyMoney 4.5

2010-08-21 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 22 August 2010 09:35:56 Alvaro Soliverez wrote: > Can't you make an exception? > Otherwise you will ship squeeze with a version that requires KDE3 > libs, and we won't support it nowhere near as long as the squeeze > lifecycle. Unfortunately not. The freeze is frozen and we can't do muc

Re: KMyMoney 4.5

2010-08-21 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 22 August 2010 07:38:00 Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Monday 16 August 2010 23:30:16 Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Today I got a msg that KMyMoney 4.5 was released, which completes the I'm Planning on uploading kmymoney 4.5 to experimental in the next few days. It won't be able to be uploa

Re: KDE SC 4.5.0

2010-08-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thursday 12 August 2010 11:49:15 Odair Augusto Trujillo Orozco wrote: > Please, include KDE SC 4.5.0 on Squezee. Odair, Typically KDE SC do not really stabilise until .2, .3 or later for more stability. Thus releasing squeeze with version 4.4.5 is a good call as it is a pretty stable system

Re: Kopete 1.0: Cannot load the WLM Messenger protocol plugin

2010-07-25 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 25 July 2010 21:11:35 Lars Schimmer wrote: > MSN plugin hits the error: > "Cannot load the WLM Messenger protocol plugin". MSN plugin works fine here on sid: kopete/4:4.4.5-1 libmsn0.3/4.1-1.2 Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: KMyMoney questions

2010-05-21 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 22 May 2010 03:42:45 Diederik de Haas wrote: > - What's a good place to ask questions wrt KMyMoney? I found a mailing > list, kmymoney-devel, but that really looks like a mailing list for the > developers, not for users like me. Diederik, There is an upstream user list or IRC is alwa

Re: SIP Phone Alternatives

2010-05-07 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 08 May 2010 09:52:24 Leonardo Meira wrote: > In Lenny I use Twinkle to use my SIP phone account. > But in Squeeze I'd like to use another application in the place of Twinkle. > Preferentially a software better integrated to the KDE 4.x/Qt 4.x desktop > which is what I use. > > Any alte

Re: KDE in Debian, a personal POV

2010-05-07 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 08 May 2010 05:52:09 Mike Bird wrote: > Would it be possible to continue > rebuilding and shipping KDE 3.5, perhaps in "contrib", > perhaps with a huge "no security updates" disclaimer? People in Debian will work on what they want too, no more, no less. If you want a KDE3.5 team then

Re: Kaffeine is a mere shadow of itself

2010-05-07 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 07 May 2010 17:36:12 Sven Joachim wrote: > Given that kaffeine > 0.8 was a quite mature program with lots of features, I find this very > sad. Sven, Please ensure you forward this upstream. Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Kde 3.5 ...

2010-05-06 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 07 May 2010 03:26:34 Curt Howland wrote: > There are lots of people who are interested in having KDE3 > continue, as opposed to being "forced to upgrade" to This is what I don't understand about this conservation. This is free software, nobody is forced to do anything. You are free to

Re: [KDE 4.4.1] kipi-plugins wants libkdcraw7 and libkipi6

2010-03-22 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 04:39:36 Sugo wrote: > >aptitude -t experimental-snapshots install digikam > > Yes, ok. But when I try to install kipi-plugins, it ask a dependency > with libkdcraw7 and libkipi6, which is not present in exp-snapshots > repository, and I have a conflict with kdegr We h

digikam packages Re: Semi-official KDE SC 4.4.1 available (external repository)

2010-03-05 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 05 March 2010 19:17:28 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > If I were to rebuild digikam for KDE 4.4.1 SC, which version string should > I use? 2:1.1.0-1 as in unstable or 3:1.1.0-1 or what? I just ask in case > anyone else wanted this, for my local installation I do not care that > much. A pa

[Bug 220236] Re: digikam still unuseable for me

2009-12-30 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 23:29:47 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > Hi, > > I have already mailed to the list regarding this issue. > But it seems to me that not nepomuk is the culprit, as indicated > in the discussion. (see bug #560893) > > I built me a completely nepomuk-free digikam (at least I thin

Re: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 18 December 2009 23:59:29 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > it is switched off but I noticed a running nepomukserver (but not the other > nepomuk processes). Killing that process and running digikam afterwards did > not change anything :-\. Dietz, Please run strace on digikam. $ strace digikam

Re: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 18 December 2009 23:19:21 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > > It was nepomuk, I have disabled Nepomuk Semantic Desktop (System > > Settings) and CPU back down to 1% now... > > Thx. Unfortunately, I am not using Nepomuk at all :-\. Dietz, I wasn't using it either, but it was switched on. Have yo

Re: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 18 December 2009 19:54:16 Mark Purcell wrote: > On Thursday 17 December 2009 07:02:45 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > > Digikam eats up 95%+ of the cpu and does not terminate properly. > > (bug ##560893) Upstreams says, this might be a Debian problem. > > > > Theref

Re: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thursday 17 December 2009 07:02:45 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > Digikam eats up 95%+ of the cpu and does not terminate properly. > (bug ##560893) Upstreams says, this might be a Debian problem. > > Therefore, can anyone confirm the behaviour? Yes I can confirm: http://bugs.debian.org/560893 and I

Re: Digikam-doc misses a developer

2009-12-16 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 02:46:16 Valerio Passini wrote: > At the moment none is taking care of packaging digikam documentation. > Digikam is in extragear, nonetheless it is a very popular application > for managing and editing pictures and it's quite complex to use it > without a good manu

Re: Upload of KDE 4.3.3?

2009-12-01 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:53:27 André Wöbbeking wrote: > On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Manolete, ese artista wrote: > > A probably banal question made fron ignorance, and just out of > > curiosity: what impedes 4.3.2 to enter Testing? http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=

Re: Amarok 2.2.0 "plays" mp3s in an instant

2009-10-02 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 02 October 2009 23:44:10 Cade Robinson wrote: > > What about libxine1-ffmpeg package? Is it installed? > > That was not installed. > I installed it and it fixed the issue. > > Thanks! > Thanks that worked for me too! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [opensuse-kde] Re: Deleting the Selection

2009-07-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:38:00 am Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Thanks. I didn't know scim-bridge was from the KDE project. What about http://www.scim-im.org/development/bug_reports. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#530444: RM: libkdcraw -- NVIU; RoM; Now provided as a component of kdegraphics

2009-05-24 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal In KDE3 libkdcraw4 was provided as a seperate package/ library. In KDE4 libkdcraw7 is provided as a library of the kdegraphics source package. Please remove the source package libkdcraw from both testing & unstable. There are no rdepends in testing/unsta

Bug#530443: RM: libkexif -- ROM; Obsolete - originaly part of KDE3 - no rdepends

2009-05-24 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal This library was origianly part of KDE3 support for digikam. It is now obsolete and should be removed from testing & unstable. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm

Re: KDE 4 simply broken

2009-05-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 15 May 2009 03:15:07 jedd wrote: > > You seem to have some display corruptions. Especially the intel > > driver is currently known for having big issues with that. > > Yes, I've heard nasty rumours about the Intel driver being a bit > dodgy, but I was using the same driver on xorg for t

Re: Pin to keep kde3.5.9?

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 03:31:10 Jakub Krajewski wrote: > KNemo (great app) which I am using extensively on my KDE 3.5 desktop was > already ported to KDE4 and you can grab it here: Even better, You can grab the Debian package of the KDE4 version of knemo here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/kne

Re: When to report bugs upstream [was Re: Lancelot locks accessing NTFS partition]

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 13 April 2009 20:30:29 Mark Purcell wrote: > Bug filed: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189520 > Mon Apr 13 20:26:59 EST 2009 > > six minutes. > > Lets see what upstream do with it now ;-) Mon Apr 13 20:56:57 EST 2009 Hey look I have a response from upstream with

Re: When to report bugs upstream [was Re: Lancelot locks accessing NTFS partition]

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
> > What I have found works best is when upstream subscribe to the Debian > > package tracking system (kmymoney2, kile, ...) and then forward PTS email > > into their upstream -dev mailing list. > > What does PTS stand for? Sorry, That is the Package Tracking System, which is an email subscriptio

Re: When to report bugs upstream [was Re: Lancelot locks accessing NTFS partition]

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 11 April 2009 19:21:11 Arthur Marsh wrote: > > upstream. Takes me about 3-6 minutes per bug. Because that is what > > Debian is about. Lots of people, like you, doing a little bit of work > > when they have some spare time. [...] > > So with your next spare 3 minutes, look at the BTS,

Re: When to report bugs upstream [was Re: Lancelot locks accessing NTFS partition]

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 11 April 2009 19:21:11 Arthur Marsh wrote: > [As an aside, HPLIP *DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ANY MAILING LISTS* and this was > a barrier against finding and reporting bugs upstream against HPLIP )-:.] Thanks Arthur, This is a very good point. What I have found works best is when upstream sub

Re: My assesment

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 12 April 2009 10:32:10 George Bodley wrote: > KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look for a > different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or Debian or > Sidux needs to give us back our old KDE 3.5 George, This really is a troll. Debian lenny w

Re: Kuickshow replacement in KDE 4.2.2

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 13 April 2009 19:43:15 Benjamí Villoslada wrote: > From yesterday Kuickshow isn't available. Now Kmail (i.e.) show images > with GIMP, a good program for image editing but excessive for display only. > > Any KDE 4.2.2 Kuickshow replacement? I get in order: kolourpaint Iceweasel showfot

Re: Helping Debian KDE

2009-04-10 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 10 April 2009 20:55:09 Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > Please provide me more information on how I can assist Debian KDE team. > > If you have documents somewhere on how people can assist, do let me know. Sharuzzaman, Thanks for your email. Some details of how people can help are ava

Re: Bluetooth in KDE4

2009-04-09 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 10 April 2009 09:04:39 Martin Neumann wrote: > Nothing of this is possible at the moment with KDE4 in Sid although it > was working flawlessly in KDE3.5. Martin, Quite a few of us are using bluetooth as well. Unfortunately KDE4 doesn't have the full functionality of KDE3 so if those f

Options for the Debian KDE team (was: Lancelot locks accessing NTFS partition)

2009-04-09 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 10 April 2009 00:46:44 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Won't someone please think of the users? Boyd, The Debian KDE team can do about 5-10 things in a month. Which would the users prefer: 1. Handle 2 RC bugs, build, package and upload 3 packages from KDE 4.2.x and discuss on I

Re: Lancelot locks accessing NTFS partition

2009-04-09 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thursday 09 April 2009 11:14:26 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >Are you aware about how many Debian packagers has the Qt/KDE team? Do you > >imagine how many time is needed to handle this? And not only the KDE > > people, but other teams as well. > > If Debian can't shoulder the burden of maint

Re: [ANN] KDE 4.2 moving to unstable *this* week

2009-04-06 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 06 April 2009 18:27:22 Magnus Pedersen wrote: > > KDE 4.2 will move from experimental to unstable this week. We can not > > tell the exact day. > > Whats status on the move? > > /Magnus > Being curious Magnus, If you are really curious, then I can recommend the following: 1. Subscribe

Re: About ban-unstable-uploads

2009-03-29 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 30 March 2009 04:26:24 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > Now the problem is, the version of rkward in unstable is already based on > KDE 4 (it was uploaded in June 2008). This version is terribly broken right > now (admittedly it has been badly broken for a while, but things have > deterioa

Re: New plasma-widgets

2009-03-27 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 27 March 2009 22:48:21 Valerio Passini wrote: > only to choice weather services among a subset of countries belonging to > the Commonwealth Valerio, I find that the BBC weather service isn't that great either for Commonwealth countries. I'm in Australia and it is sometimes quite off

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-09-24 Thread Mark Purcell
I'm at akademy in Dublin today and tomorrow. Any debianers want to catch up? Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian KDE Extras Team presentation for Akademy

2006-06-30 Thread Mark Purcell
e cycles. What are sid, etch and sarge anyway. * Debian Popularity Contest and KDE applications Mark Purcell is an admin for the Debian KDE Extras and Pkg VOIP teams which also provides the KDE twinkle & kiax builds for ubuntu and debian distribu tions. He has been a Debian developer since 2001

Re: Successfull upgrade to 3.4.2

2005-09-08 Thread Mark Purcell
Jan, > (for those interested: http://debian.kcore.org/ for my 'transitioned' > packages > - NOT official! tho they're mainly rebuilds of official ones) Rather than building your own NOT official 'tranisitioned' packages. Could I ask you to setup an account on alioth.debian.org, we will give you

KDE_ENABLE_HIDDEN_VISIBILITY

2005-08-20 Thread Mark Purcell
In rebuilding a number of KDE packages for gcc 4. It would appear that there is an issue with KDE_ENABLE_HIDDEN_VISIBILITY, which is generally swtiched on in configure.in.in. The short fix appears to delete/comment out this switch as there are issues with gcc 4. Thought I would post this her

Re: Bug#323372: kmymoney2: package cannot be installed on sid

2005-08-16 Thread Mark Purcell
severity 323372 normal thanks Walter, Thanks for your bug report. Unfortunately there isn't much point in rebuilding kmymoney2 until the current G++ transition is progressed. More details on the transition are available here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2005/08/msg00089.html While KDE

Re: For sid users: An overview of the KDE C++ ABI transition

2005-08-12 Thread Mark Purcell
Adeodato (and the rest of the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers), Thanks for the updates. It is great to hear what is going on and get the updates as to what is happening. Looks like a long weekend now that we can start the tranisition for the rest of the Qt/KDE applications. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIB

GCC++4 ABI transition for KDE?

2005-07-13 Thread Mark Purcell
Ref: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2005/06/msg00057.html Given that a number of downstream packages depend on KDE, things are awaiting the GCC++ ABI transition for the main KDE body before the applications can start moving in. What is the plan for the rebuild of Qt/ kdelibs with GCC4? Mar

Bug#182942: Found no KOffice part able to handle application/x-kword!

2003-03-01 Thread Mark Purcell
[CC'ed to debian-kde] On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:35:53PM -0700, Ben Burton wrote: > > > It seems that if I move all of ~/.kde out of the way kword functions > > correctly. > > If you don't move ~/.kde out of the way, but instead run kbuildsycoca to > rebuild the system configuration cache, does

Re: kmail within kde3.1 on sid ?

2003-02-14 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:27:54PM +0100, Petr Bal wrote: > One problem - this version doesn't support IMAP :-((( It supports IMAP for me when I first startup kmail, but after I have been online for a while and new messages come in they are shown as a bold number of unread messages, but I can'

Re: No kmail in sid?

2003-02-14 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:47:20PM +0100, Felix Homann wrote: > kmail: relocation error: kmail: undefined symbol: _ZN8DwString4nposE Purge libmimelib1 and then reinstall from unstable. `dpkg --purge libmimelib1` libmimelib1 is one of the few packages which doesn't auto upgrade from the u

Rationale behind admin/debianrules (was: Qt Changes ahead - Info for package maintainers + developers)

2003-02-10 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > a) Chris Cheney: update kde-common/admin/debianrules and fix > > kdelibs/debian/dh-make template that people are going to use to produce > > KDE debs with. Whilst I understand the rational behind the admin/debianrules my personal experience with

Official release of KDE3.1 and Debian

2003-01-28 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf, Given the official release of KDE3.1 today , I would like to thank you for your efforts in ensuring that Debian was one of the distributions which had packages for KDE3.1 available from KDE'

[rn's debs] kdelibs overwrite problem

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Purcell
Ralf, Thanks for your continual updates... There is an overwrite problem between kdelibs4 and libkdefakes4. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs4_4%3a3.1.0-0woody2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libkdefakes.so.4.1.0', which is also in package libkdefakes4

Re: Debian Woody packages for KDE 3.1 + ?gypten

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:06:51PM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote: > Packages not in unstable but from gnupg.org: > dirmngr libksba mutts-gpgme newpg opensc pinentry Ralf again excellent work. Are you planning on raising an IPT and uploading these packages to unstable? Or are you in a position to

[kl's debs] koffice overwrite problems..

2003-01-20 Thread Mark Purcell
Karolina, Thanks for your continued efforts in putting together these packages. Have a bit of an issue upgrading to your latest version: Likely a Replaces/ Conflicts issue. Removing koffice-libs first and then installing again overcomes the issues. apt-get remove koffice-libs && apt-get instal

Re: Unable to install kde3.1 on unstable

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:47:51PM +, Dan Slatford wrote: > Ahhh, thankyou. I've installed that now, as it gives me libfam-dev, which is > also needed to install kdelibs-dev. I can't find the original libfam-dev for > libfam0 2.6.9-3 anywhere. Sarge has an earlier version. All seems well for

Re: final binaries of 3.1 up

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Purcell
> the final binaries of the RC 7 are now uploaded including a new kdeutils with > fixed ark stuff. The libkdefakes has been split off as has ksysguardd now. Excellent work Ralf, Thanks! ksysguardd works well on my gateway router with nothing else from KDE/X11 installed.. Seems to be an issue w

Re: libkdefakes as it's own package

2003-01-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:48:13AM -0500, James Greenhalgh wrote: > Folks, > > I've noticed one app in particular (ksysguardd [note the dd]) but I'm sure > there are more in KDE that use libkdefakes as the only lib. I'd like this > lib > to be separate from kdelibs4 as the overhead to install

Re: Konqueror: Embedding of packed documents

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok. I have actually had a look into the KDE Bug list and it has been reported... http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19229 I suppose we should add additional comments there, rather than further discussion in debian-kde. Of course that bug report h

Re: Konqueror: Embedding of packed documents

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:18, Casper Gielen wrote: > Op donderdag 9 januari 2003 10:07, schreef Frank Mehnert: > > Exactly. Mozilla is able to do that. If you click on references like > > paper then the document is first unzipped and > > then displayed in

Re: Konqueror: Embedding of packed documents

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:02, Ralf Nolden wrote: > On Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2003 07:56, Mark Purcell wrote: > > Actually this feature is already documented as being provided in KDE.. > > The gzip kioslave description in 'Info Center&

Re: Konqueror: Embedding of packed documents

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:40, Thomas Ritter wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 21:29 schrieb David Pye: > > If it's gzipped, how can KDE/Konq etc know what is INSIDE the gzip > > without opening it? ie the mimetype will be the zip, not the pdf/ps file. >

Re: sid version up

2003-01-06 Thread Mark Purcell
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:01:56AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote: > deb http://ktown.kde.org/~nolden/kde/sid/i386/ ./ Excellent work Ralf. Thanks alot... Working well here... Mark pgpxV9yt4t8U4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Debian KDE maintainer burnout??? (was: Warning)

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:36, Daniel Stone wrote: > > I for one, and I'm sure there would be many others in the Debian > > community, would be happy for either or both of you to become the > > official Debian maintainers for KDE. Goodness knows you have

Debian KDE maintainer burnout??? (was: Warning)

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:09, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > I updated to latest debian "unstable" level, and my KDE does not work > anymore. These break-everything debian updates makes me kind of tired > sometimes. [...] > I really don't know what is update

Correction: KDE 3.0.x incompatible with libfontconfig1=2.1-8 Re: KDE 3.0.x deb's incompatible with unstable libqt (2:3.1.1+cvs.20021220-1)

2002-12-22 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:41:26PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote: > Package: kdelibs-bin > Version: 4:3.0.4-1 > Severity: grave > > It would appear that the KDE 3.0.4 debs on download.kde.org are incompatible > with the just uploaded libQt qt-x11-free (2:3.1.1+cvs.20021220-1)

KDE 3.0.x deb's incompatible with unstable libqt (2:3.1.1+cvs.20021220-1)

2002-12-22 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: kdelibs-bin Version: 4:3.0.4-1 Severity: grave It would appear that the KDE 3.0.4 debs on download.kde.org are incompatible with the just uploaded libQt qt-x11-free (2:3.1.1+cvs.20021220-1) In short if you are running the KDE 3.0.x Debs from download.kde.org hang off upgrading your qt st

Re: KDE3 - Debian/experimental distribution proposal (was: yes i am alive ;)

2002-10-21 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:01, Ben Burton wrote: > And so I will nevertheless stick with the main point of my previous post > which was, if we're going to use experimental, to argue for very clear > documentation to be available on just what to do with APT

Re: KDE3 - Debian/experimental distribution proposal

2002-10-19 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 04:24:59PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote: > Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/ > uploads for experimental? A very good start and something that could happen within hours would be for Karolina or a DD sponser to modify the Debian changelog for he

Re: KDE3 - Debian/experimental distribution proposal

2002-10-19 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 04:24:59PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote: > Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/ > uploads for experimental? That would be excellent if you would do that and quite suitable to upload the kde3.1x builds into unstable. It would also allow me to upl

KDE3 - Debian/experimental distribution proposal (was: yes i am alive ;)

2002-10-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:05:38AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > Feel free to reply to this thread regarding any ideas on cleanups, or > anything else related to packaging. There seems to be a lot of confusion about Debian and KDE3 and I think most of it stems from not having a standard consistent

Re: KDE 3.1beta2 packages

2002-10-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:48:16AM +0200, Michael Stucki wrote: > deb ftp://download.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/kde-3.1-beta2/Debian/woody/ ./ > > Now where can I get the latest Beta packages? They seem to of gone as of last week. Have a look for a post earlier in the week from Ralf Nolden. The on

Re: KDE packages (3.0.4 and 3.1)

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05, Ralf Nolden wrote: > a) Sorry > ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I > didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta > build and that I should have regenerate

Re: Comparing Debian KDE 3.1 Beta 2 packages

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 23:23, Yenar Calentaure wrote: > > Ralf's http://download.kde.org/unstable/kde-3.1-beta2/Debian/woody/ > I used first set (i compiled them actually) with good enough results > (there are some issues naturally, esp. with noatun/arts

Re: Comparing Debian KDE 3.1 Beta 2 packages

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 22:45, Yenar Calentaure wrote: > >>http://download.kde.org/unstable/kde-3.1-beta2/Debian/woody/ > > > Can someone fill me in on the correct sources.list line - this doesn't > > find the packages file > > I'm afraid there is no such t

Comparing Debian KDE 3.1 Beta 2 packages

2002-10-07 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seems like we have a choice now :-) Has anyone compared the two sets of Debian KDE 3.1 Beta 2 packages? Ralf's http://download.kde.org/unstable/kde-3.1-beta2/Debian/woody/ or Karolina's http://shakti.ath.cx/debian/kde3.1-beta2/ Apart from the way t

Re: KDE 3.2-beta2

2002-09-29 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 21:03, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > KDE 3.2-beta2 appears to never get announced. I guess it is delayed. (or > have I missed the announcement somehow). Karolina, Thanks for the quick work. Your efforts are very much appreciated.. Mark

Re: KMail Only Works Once Per Session

2002-09-16 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 06:17:13PM +0300, Vyacheslav E. Sidin wrote: > Hi Mark. > Can you please tell me apt sources.list line for download KDE3.1 beta debs > which are you using ? Sure have a look at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2002/debian-kde-200209/msg00017.html Mark

Re: KMail Only Works Once Per Session

2002-09-15 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 23:12, Robert Tilley wrote: > I'm running KDE 3.1 beta and have noticed something very strange with KMail > -- It will only download mail _once_ per KDE session. If I try to fetch > mail again, it does nothing. Running KDE3.1 (Kar

Re: kde3.1-beta1

2002-09-03 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > >You can look in: > >http://cgi.algonet.se/htbin/cgiwrap/pgd/debian > >which leads you to my ftp area containing KDE3.1-beta ... > >-- Karolina Karolina, Great work, they seem to work well here. I for one would like to see these uploaded to t

Re: KDE 3.0.3 packages uploaded

2002-08-20 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Nick Sanders wrote: > Try it, honestly the first line doesn't work maybe they have changed > something > recently. In both cases the Packages.gz file is found but with the first one > the apt can't find the actual packages. Thanks Nick. You are quite r

Re: KDE 3.0.3 packages uploaded

2002-08-20 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Try the following in your /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://people.debian.org/~branden/sid/i386 ./ # XFree4.2 deb http://download.us.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.0.3/Debian ./ # KDE 3.0.3 Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (

Bug#157255: Konqueror SSL vunerability

2002-08-19 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: kdelibs3-crypto Version: 4:2.2.2-6 Severity: critical Tags: security upstream http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20020818-1.txt KDE Security Advisory: Konqueror SSL vulnerability Original Release Date: 2002-08-18 URL: http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20020818-1.txt 0. Re

Debian kpovmodeler (was: configure error on debian woody kde 2.2.2)

2002-07-28 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 12:05, gerhard wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 03:23 schrieb Mark Purcell: > > libqt-gl-dev > > Thank you for the proposal to use the apt-get option build-dep > > debian:/home/gerhard/download/kpovmodeler/kpovmodeler-0.1.1# >

Re: configure error on debian woody kde 2.2.2

2002-07-27 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 02:35:44AM +0200, gerhard wrote: > What Kind of Qt version in debian supports the OpenGL extension? > I don't want to update now to KDE 3.1alpha to install > KPovModeler 0.2 I would suggest you also install the libqt-gl-dev package. A good way to ensure you have all the d

Re: KOffice 1.2-beta2 packages uploaded

2002-07-07 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:16:15PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > Let me know if there are any problems. Thanks for that Ben, seem to be running well here, just a wishlist thing. You might like to include 'Suggests: wordnet' for koffice-libs. Kthesaurus and thus kword are designed to provide extra f

Re: kmerlin 1.0-1 package

2002-05-25 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Ra?l Alexis Betancort Santana wrote: > > Hi all, some days ago, someone post in this list and URL to fetch the > kmerlin 1.0-1 .debs for KDE3, I lost that message and searching the > debian-lists archive dont give me the URL, could someone resend it to >

Re: i-touch key shortcut

2002-05-25 Thread Mark Purcell
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:47:08PM +0200, =?ISO-8859-2?Q? Tom=E1=B9?= Potrusil wrote: > Hi folks, > do you know how to bind in KDE3 internet keys on my > keyboard with some actions, eg. "start konqueror"... > I saw that KDE recognizes the keys, but I can bind them > only with actions like "swi

Re: KDE 3.0.1 debs

2002-05-25 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 06:29:58PM +1000, David Fisher wrote: > Can someone take pity and set me aright here please? David, Have a look at http://calc.cx/kde, the apt source line is there and is: deb http://kde3.geniussystems.net/debian ./ Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

KDE3 jpeg & konsole (was: gcc 3.1 and KDE3)

2002-05-20 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 20 May 2002 20:40, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > > - I can see jpegs images in preview nor desktop wallpaper but int > > > konqueror works well > > I have the same Problem. Does it work correctly for anybody else? Works fine here! Using KDE3 (T

Kmerlin-1.0 for KDE3..

2002-05-15 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 May 2002 20:24, Jarno Elonen wrote: > Please do! Someone! I've got a nasty situation with apt: some packages that > were on the Geniussystems' server need "-f install" and apt-get refuses to > do practically anything else before I get those

Re: KDE 3.0.1 packages

2002-05-15 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 May 2002 12:10, Kamil Kisiel wrote: > WhizDNR-, the owner of the geniussystems.net domain has been having > problems with his registrar or ISP, something along those lines, so the > site is currently down. We did have two other mirrors going

Re: Experimental KDE3 debs -- first impressions

2002-05-12 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 12 May 2002 20:50, Michael Spanier wrote: > The install went not so smooth, but after explaining the situation clearly > to dpkg and friendly by using --force-depends and --force-overwrite I was > able to get a running kde3. The instructions l

Re: Bug#127252: kmerlin: Nope, it broke it

2002-01-09 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:38:31PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:38:47AM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote: > Ivan decided that libpng3 was the way forward for libqt2 people, but > then Chris (rightly, IMHO) decided that libqt2 would keep libpng2, and > libqt3 would

Re: Bug#127252: kmerlin: Nope, it broke it

2002-01-08 Thread Mark Purcell
Ok I see what has happened now. The libpng2/3 fiasco continues. It appears that after having to recompile kmerlin to work with libqt2/libpng3 that they (maintainers of those pacakages) have decided that I again have to recompile, but this time with libqt2/libpng2. :-( I'll upload something in th

Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled against the wrong libpng

2002-01-02 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 01:06:21PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Mit, 02 Jan 2002, Mark Purcell wrote: > > > > That's the problem; there is just no real solution besides a big > > > recompile. > > > > My question still remains. If we require a big

Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled against the wrong libpng

2002-01-02 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > That's the problem; there is just no real solution besides a big > recompile. My question still remains. If we require a big recompile, when/ how are we going to bother to advise the maintainers

Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled against the wrong libpng

2002-01-01 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:50:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:39:07 +1100 Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The solution is rather simple, requiring recompilation to > > get the correct linkage to libpng3, but it would of been nice t

  1   2   >