On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Or, my variation of the question: Why not just build-depend on g++-3.2,
> build the packages and their dependencies (anything other than Qt?)
> explicitly with g++-3.2, and upload to unstable or experimental. Once
You'd need to comp
On Sunday, September 22, 2002, at 08:53 AM, Paolo Ulivi wrote:
Sorry, I explain better: I am already working on the cvs sources for my
Woody box, I just want to import them in my local repository in the same
form as they are at kde.org so I can browse in the code as from a
mirror.
Surely, I will
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:50:47AM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> The way I understand it, this is wrong: you can't simply add a new clause
> like
> that to GPL, as you couldn't then compile *your* software against *other*
> GPL'd stuff.
Sure you can, providing you don't introduce any new GPL-in
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> No gpl violation. KDE does _not_ link against libssl.
kdebase-crypto depends on libssl because libkcm_crypto is linked against
libssl.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSC
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 05:46, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > Packaging KDE for a particular platform is not too difficult. It is simply
> Packaging KDE is significantly more difficult than most other packaging
> tasks. KDE depends on many l
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:00:24PM +0100, Laurent Rathle wrote:
> I've generated a key with 3 different UID with GPG. I affected each one to an
> identity in KMail. When I sign my message, KMail always use the same identity
> for the three. Is it possible to have a key with three UID with KMail
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 08:55:02AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> the Dark Ages. When you ask people what the best thing about Debian is,
> they respond "policy" (in general; some say dpkg/apt). So what are we
> doing? Random crap, I hear you say?
Not to mention the fact that one of the major reaso
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:18:49PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Using /opt for packages doesn't violate the policy in any way. I repeat,
> James *is* right. I suggest you to read it thoroughly before making further
> judgement.
Deciding to use it for KDE would, however, result in large nu
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:26:43PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> mirror: B_more_in_sync
> --
> Package: A
> (has been replaced by Aplus or is not available any more)
> Depends: B ( = 0.2)
So package A which does not exist depends on B=0.2? Huh?
--
"You grab
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
> > deb ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/debian unstable main contrib
> > non-free
> 1) and 2
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:50:48AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> "When it's ready". Bear in mind, however, that KDE has the fastest
> release team/whatever known to man.
Any chance of getting them to work on Debian instead/as well :-) .
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydrea
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:06:17PM +0200, Franz Keferboeck wrote:
> a possibility to share the mail-folders between lin & win. It would be best
> to be able to do this with KMail and Outlook (Express and "normal"), but also
> other solutions qould be possible! Thnx in advance
Not on-disk unless
12 matches
Mail list logo
