Re: libqt just broke again

2002-01-08 Thread Krystian G Bates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 08 January 2002 09:29 am, Bjoern Krombholz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 08:19:22AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > > The only icons problems I had before yesterday were korganizer and > > knotes (all I noticed anyway). After yesterday

Re: All KDE Icons have gone since yesterday....

2001-12-31 Thread Krystian G Bates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 31 December 2001 08:01 pm, John Gay wrote: > > Seems I spoke a bit too soon. The actual symptoms I have are: > KMail, which starts from the saved state of my KDE login, has no icons. > Konqueror, which also starts from the saved state, does

Re: Problem with libqt2?

2001-12-29 Thread Krystian G Bates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 29 December 2001 08:30 am, Robert Tilley wrote: > Selected version 2:2.3.1-8 (Debian:testing) for libqt2 Now that's odd... when I did it, I got version 3:2.3.1-17, and hte only thing it removed was some of the kde-dev packages (which I

Re: Problem with libqt2?

2001-12-28 Thread Krystian G Bates
On Friday 28 December 2001 11:17 pm, Krystian G Bates wrote: And wouldn't you know, I already cleaned my cache out... Can anyone point me to a spot to wget libqt2_3*-17.deb from? > On Friday 28 December 2001 09:34 pm, Oliver Johns wrote: > Aye, just started having the same problem

Re: Problem with libqt2?

2001-12-28 Thread Krystian G Bates
On Friday 28 December 2001 09:34 pm, Oliver Johns wrote: Aye, just started having the same problem. Out of my kdm.log: libpng warning: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.2.1 libpng warning: Application is using png.c from libpng-1.0.12 libpng error: Incompatible libpng version in

Re: a modest propposal for kde 3

2001-12-15 Thread Krystian G Bates
On Saturday 15 December 2001 12:00 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 12:41:25AM +0800, csj wrote: > > Wouldn't it be nice to have kde-3.0 or kde3.0 packages that can coexist > > with soon-to-stable kde 2.2, which would remain packaged as plain kde? > > This would be analagous to