On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:22:47 -0800, "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:59:03PM -0800, Hereon wrote:
> > Is there info available that indicates whether it is "safe" to apt-get
> > upgrade a KDE system? [ie, that the upgr
Is there info available that indicates whether it is "safe" to apt-get
upgrade a KDE system? [ie, that the upgrade will not result in major
packages missing, or not working.]
I have a KDE 3.1.4 on testing/woody, for x86, using pinning to get the
sid debs, last updated about 2 mos ago.
I saw:
http
Since many questions in the debian-kde list are user oriented questions,
I thought it would be helpful to the Debian community to ensure the
readers here aware of the following message I just sent to the
debian-user list.
RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user
http://l
--- Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Which doesn't mean it's in a good status. But the opposite.
> >
> > Ricardo - You say that it is in "the opposite of good status".
> >
> > Do you mean:
> >
> > 1) That some extra steps beyond normal are required to _install_ it?
> > (As Paul indic
--- Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 04 October 2003 10:53, Paul Cupis shaped the electrons to
> shout:
> > > 2) There are instructions for installing for sid, which would seem to
> > > imply that it is available.
> >
> > It is available.
>
> Which doesn't mean it's in a goo
Looking at the debian kde wiki page, it's ambiguous what the status is.
1) There is no "status" indicator.
2) There are instructions for installing for sid, which would seem to imply
that it is available.
3) An rc bug (qt-x11-free) is mentioned, but this doesn't necessarily imply
that a kde _ins
6 matches
Mail list logo
