On Thursday 12 July 2012 23:22:04 Bruce Sass wrote:
> On July 12, 2012 02:10:33 PM Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thursday 12 July 2012 13:55:17 Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > > 1) Trinity is not in Debian.
> > >
> > > True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems
On July 12, 2012 02:13:20 PM Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alle giovedì 12 luglio 2012, Bruce Sass ha scritto:
> > > 1) Trinity is not in Debian.
> >
> > True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems
> > which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some
>
On July 12, 2012 03:37:38 PM Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Bruce Sass wrote:
>
> Bla bla bla
>
> Seriously ???
Yup
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207
Bruce Sass wrote:
Bla bla bla
Seriously ???
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/470dd0bf-bf8b-4829-b9b2-7d7d14ffa...@email.android.com
On July 12, 2012 02:10:33 PM Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday 12 July 2012 13:55:17 Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > 1) Trinity is not in Debian.
> >
> > True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems
> > which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than
Hi,
Alle giovedì 12 luglio 2012, Bruce Sass ha scritto:
> > 1) Trinity is not in Debian.
>
> True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems
> which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some
> random piece of source out there.
Not really; consider for ex
Hello,
On Thursday 12 July 2012 13:55:17 Bruce Sass wrote:
> > 1) Trinity is not in Debian.
>
> True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which
> makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece
> of source out there.
FIY, nobody stepped up t
On July 12, 2012 06:40:28 AM Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2012 m. of July 12 d., Thursday 00:10:57 Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On July 9, 2012 01:54:05 PM hrvojes wrote:
> > > On Monday 09 of July 2012 15:48:01 john Culleton wrote:
> > > > BTW KDE has gone down hill of late. It gets as many c
Hello,
On 2012 m. of July 12 d., Thursday 00:10:57 Bruce Sass wrote:
> On July 9, 2012 01:54:05 PM hrvojes wrote:
> > On Monday 09 of July 2012 15:48:01 john Culleton wrote:
> > > BTW KDE has gone down hill of late. It gets as many complaints as
> > > Vista it seems. My solution is simple. I use T
On Thursday 12 Jul 2012 08:44:47 Andrej Kacian wrote:
> it is perfectly possible to use KDE4 without all the
> social, semantic, and/or cloudy crap that's being pushed to Linux
> desktop in recent years. It just takes bit of tweaking.
That's prety much how I use KDE4.
alexd
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:41:43 +0200
Valerio Passini wrote:
> KDE 3 was very good, but leave it in its era, without fancy desktops,
> social networks, streaming media services, huge data collections,
> and clouds.
Mmm, this statement makes me want to start using KDE3 again. :) But in
all fairnes
11 matches
Mail list logo