Spam mail warning notification! (LGI Policies)

2005-07-03 Thread NO-REPLY . antispam
eManager Notification * The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Policy: LGI Policies Action: Delete Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. *** End of

Re: Upgrading KDE and it's dependencies

2005-07-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Larry Garfield wrote: > Am I the only one who upgrades KDE without problems? In the 2+ years I've > been using Debian, I've taken KDE from 2.2.2 to 3.4.1, including every point > release along the way, with only one hiccup; And that was a random 3rd party > repository for KDE 3.0 under Woody th

Read this before purchasing penis enlarge products!

2005-07-03 Thread Peggy
Wish you could be better? http://www.siratu.com/ss/ If we don't chase things--sometimes the things following us can catch up. In love, one and one are one. Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting. There are no such things as applied sciences,

Re: Upgrading KDE and it's dependencies

2005-07-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Theo Schmidt wrote: > Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2005 02.04 schrieb Bob Proulx: > > I have a rather agressive method. > ... > > I then remove that list. WARNING! Don't do this unless you know what > > you are doing. > ... > > What is the preferred methode for those of us who don't really know > what th

Re: Upgrading KDE and it's dependencies

2005-07-03 Thread Larry Garfield
Am I the only one who upgrades KDE without problems? In the 2+ years I've been using Debian, I've taken KDE from 2.2.2 to 3.4.1, including every point release along the way, with only one hiccup; And that was a random 3rd party repository for KDE 3.0 under Woody that jammed on the KDEPIM packag

Re: Upgrading KDE and it's dependencies

2005-07-03 Thread Theo Schmidt
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2005 02.04 schrieb Bob Proulx: > Jarkko Suontausta wrote: > > Upgrading KDE when an older version is already running often causes a lot > > of trouble > > I have a rather agressive method. ... > I then remove that list. WARNING! Don't do this unless you know what > you are