On Thursday 21 April 2005 08:40 am, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Well in the meantime I also replaced x.org from Ubuntu by the one from:
>
> deb http://neo.wh-stuttgart.de/debian sid xorg
> deb-src http://neo.wh-stuttgart.de/debian sid xorg
>
> So its pure Debian again. It might be better that way.
* Antiphon [Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:51:54 -0400]:
> That's related to something I noticed a short while ago. It used to be
> that all the KDM session scripts used to be stored in /etc/kde3/kdm but
> they're no longer there. Does anyone know where they are in KDE 3.4?
From /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc:
Jan Lühr wrote:
Greetings,
I'm still sticking my nose into Kiosk - although I don't know whether this is
a kiosk issue at all.
Is there a way to force users to use KDE if I use kdm - no matter how weired
their config is?
That's related to something I noticed a short while ago. It used to be
tha
Am Freitag 22 April 2005 15:18 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > I can update to newer libc but would loose X related development
> > packages.
>
> You shouldn't. What command are you using to install libc6 from
> unstable? Try:
>
> # apt-get install -t unstable `grep-status -Fsource glibc |
>
Greetings,
I'm still sticking my nose into Kiosk - although I don't know whether this is
a kiosk issue at all.
Is there a way to force users to use KDE if I use kdm - no matter how weired
their config is?
Keep smiling
yanosz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
* Martin Steigerwald [Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:55:49 +0200]:
> The cause is this that those packages depend on libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
> but is installed 2.3.2.ds1-20 soll installiert.
> Is that intentional? This would exclude Debian Sarge users from testing
> KDE 3.4.
libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 is inten
6 matches
Mail list logo
