knode

2002-01-06 Thread Greg Madden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am using Knode from Sid ( actually all of KDE) on a Woody box. What I like to do is start an instance of knode as a differnt user, using the 'run as a different user' option by right clicking on the icon on my panel > preferences>execute. This w

Re: KDE apps cannot display Chinese fonts

2002-01-06 Thread scheme
Anthony Fok wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:52:33PM +0800, scheme wrote: > >>I'm using unstable and found KDE 2.2.2 cannot display Chinese fonts if >>anti-aliasing enabled. >> > > Check your /etc/X11/XftConfig settings. Remove these: > > dir "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/defoma/TrueType"

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:54:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > I don't understand why you say that. > Let me clarify. This is not something that can be done *cleanly* with > bugs, nor something that I have any desire to do with bugs. Bugs aren't a mechanism, they're a communications tool. If

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:43:05PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > This is not something that can be done with bugs, > > I don't understand why you say that. Let me clarify. This is not something that can be done *cleanly* wi

Re: subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
On Sunday 06 January 2002 12:09 pm, Florian Struck wrote: > On Sunday 06 January 2002 20:19, you wrote: > > Messag > > e-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Resent-From: debian-kde@lists.debian.org > > X-Mailing-List: archive/l

Re: subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread Florian Struck
On Sunday 06 January 2002 20:19, you wrote: > Messag > e-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-From: debian-kde@lists.debian.org > X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/6205 > X-Loop: debian-kde@lists.debian.org > Precedence: list > Re

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:43:05PM -0500, steve wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > However, if the rebuilt libqt2 gets into testing before the rebuilt > > > KDE apps, then the latter will suddenly break for everyone using the > > > "testing" distribution.

Re: subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread John Gay
>Hang in there, new code is always coming one bit at a time :) > That's why it costs me so much every time I do an apt-get dist-upgrade :) One bit at a time, over a 56K modem, with pay-per-minute phone charges, and the wife asking why I keep upgrading! I can't wait until ADSL finally arrives in

Re: subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread Florian Struck
On Sunday 06 January 2002 19:56, you wrote: > Op zondag 6 januari 2002 18:01, schreef Florian Struck: > > Hi its weird on most messages i see the subject using kmail but in some > > mails > > it says "no subject" even though i can see the subject in the header > > > does anyone experience this too?

Re: subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
On Sunday 06 January 2002 09:01 am, Florian Struck wrote: > Re > sent-From: debian-kde@lists.debian.org > X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/6200 > X-Loop: debian-kde@lists.debian.org > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi its weird on most messages i see the subject using kmail

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jan 4, 2002

2002-01-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:26, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > I'd just like to say that the reason for my doing this has little to do > with any dd's or the arguments that went on on the debian-devel mailing > list. While that did have some part in my decision I did not let that make > my decision as that wo

Re: subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread Frank Dekervel
Op zondag 6 januari 2002 18:01, schreef Florian Struck: > Hi its weird on most messages i see the subject using kmail but in some > mails it says "no subject" even though i can see the subject in the header > does anyone experience this too? most likely corrupted index files. try to remove .*.inde

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The reason I'm writing here is that I would like to see the problem > > packages (libqt2 and related kde apps) stay out of TESTING until > > this issue i

test

2002-01-06 Thread Florian Struck
test do not reply

subject? no subject

2002-01-06 Thread Florian Struck
Hi its weird on most messages i see the subject using kmail but in some mails it says "no subject" even though i can see the subject in the header does anyone experience this too?

Re: Minimum-impact disabling of libpng2

2002-01-06 Thread Bjoern Krombholz
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:20:33PM -0800, Oliver Johns wrote: > But, if you do remove the package libpng2, then apt-get won't do > any further upgrades, due to the many packages depending on > libpng2. Correct, as i said i hoped this problem was solved much faster. > So, maybe a minimum-impact,

Re: Adopting these packages

2002-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 04 January 2002 17:03, Daniel Stone wrote: > (BCC'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > I will adopt the KDE packages, while Chris "calc" Cheney will take Qt, and > will also be the KDE3 maintainer when it comes around to it; by the time > KDE2.2 is

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jan 4, 2002

2002-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 04 January 2002 22:50, Kamil Kisiel wrote: > After reading this thread in full, I too understand Ivan's frustration with > the situation that has arisen.. > > Ivan has put a lot of effort n to packaging KDE on Debian, and I think that > many

The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, I was just perusing this list archive (I don't subscribe, so CC me if you want me to see any followup) and noticed a message from John Gay quoting me. I had said: By the way, "imlib1" is in the same boat as libqt2: I recompiled imlib using libpng3 and loads of GNOME binaries started

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jan 4, 2002

2002-01-06 Thread Earl F Hampton
On Friday 04 January 2002 12:50, Kamil Kisiel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 04 January 2002 02:27, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > [- snip -] > > > Because some arrogant assholes (called debian maintaners officially) > > have flamed Ivan on debian-devel for hi

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jan 4, 2002

2002-01-06 Thread Pablo de Vicente
El Vie 04 Ene 2002 21:26, Ivan E. Moore II escribió: > > > >Because some arrogant assholes (called debian maintaners officially) > >have flamed Ivan on debian-devel for his very hard volunteer work. The > >most interesting is that they think they did it on behalf of Debian > >KDE Users. > > > >I c

Package dependency loop in unstable

2002-01-06 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just hit the following after an dselect update kpackage depends on rpm and librpm0 rpm depends on librpm4 librpm0 conflicts with librpm4 eek - -- Alan - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Gnu

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Daniel Stone
Excuse the LookOut! Express's crapping up of the message. Real mail client tomorrow, yeah! - Original Message - From: "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

kpackage and rpm

2002-01-06 Thread Daniel Stone
yeah, I've been aware of this for a couple of days; joeyh was kind enough to give me a heads-up. unfortunately i've been on holiday-ish for some time, so i haven't been able to dedicate as much attention as i would've liked to kde. oh well, a new kdeadmin should go up soon, with the new kpackage an

Re: KDE apps cannot display Chinese fonts

2002-01-06 Thread Anthony Fok
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:52:33PM +0800, scheme wrote: > I'm using unstable and found KDE 2.2.2 cannot display Chinese fonts if > anti-aliasing enabled. Check your /etc/X11/XftConfig settings. Remove these: dir "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/defoma/TrueType" dir "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/f

test - plz ignor

2002-01-06 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
eof

libpng? What is the current status?

2002-01-06 Thread John Gay
I haven't updated my system since this whole problem with libpng happened, so I'm still waiting to hear the current status. I must have picked up a bit of the problem, because kmail no longer has icons, but konq still works, unless I start it from the command line. So, my question is: If I do a

Minimum-impact disabling of libpng2

2002-01-06 Thread Oliver Johns
On Thursday 03 January 2002 06:40 am, Bjoern Krombholz wrote: >On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:50:03AM +0100, Laurent Rathle wrote: > > So I didn't remove libpng2 but I simply renamed > > the symlink libpng.so.2 in libpng.so.2.old and I made the > > symlink you mentionned (ln -s /usr/lib/libpng.so.3.1.2