Re: access to local Xserver?

2001-09-15 Thread Tom Joseph
Another hack to do this that is less insecure is (assuming you're logged in as "somebody" and running X): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su Password: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/somebody# cp ~somebody/.Xauthority ~ --Tom Joseph On Saturday 15 September 2001 06:54 pm, Jason Boxman wrote: > On Saturday 15 Sept

Re: objprelink

2001-09-15 Thread Jason Boxman
On Saturday 15 September 2001 06:03 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:07:29PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > > qt-x11 (2:2.3.1-13) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* Due to better sense don't use objprelink..wait for the proper > > prelinker stuff to show up > > > > Doe

Re: access to local Xserver?

2001-09-15 Thread Jason Boxman
On Saturday 15 September 2001 03:59 am, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Hi all, > > first of all i want to congratulate the packagers for their > great effort in packaging KDE2.2! > > I do have a problem though... when I 'su' as a regular user > i do not have access to the local Xserver to run X-programs

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-15 Thread Ben Burton
> yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. So does this mean package maintainers should stop using objprelink because it's causing policy violations? Or is the lintian check slightly broader than policy and objprelink within the margin of error? Ben.

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-15 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 04:17:12PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi.. I'm building packages using objprelink and getting lintian errors > similar to the following: > > E: noatun-plugins: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libnoatunluckytag.so.0.0.0 >

Re: objprelink

2001-09-15 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:07:29PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > > qt-x11 (2:2.3.1-13) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Due to better sense don't use objprelink..wait for the proper prelinker > stuff to show up > > Does this means it is compiled _without_ objprelink? Well I would htin

Re: Problems with kdevelop 1.4

2001-09-15 Thread Norman Jordan
It doesn't matter if KDevelop 1.4 can find htsearch. It will still not be able +to index the documentation if you are using the Debian package of htdig. As for the problem of finding htsearch, that can be fixed in KDevelop. On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:36:47PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote: > > I just

objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-15 Thread Ben Burton
Hi.. I'm building packages using objprelink and getting lintian errors similar to the following: E: noatun-plugins: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libnoatunluckytag.so.0.0.0 E: noatun-plugins: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libnoatunmadness.so.0.0.0 E: noatun-plugins: shlib-with-non-pic-code us

objprelink

2001-09-15 Thread Maximilian Reiss
qt-x11 (2:2.3.1-13) unstable; urgency=low . * Due to better sense don't use objprelink..wait for the proper prelinker stuff to show up Does this means it is compiled _without_ objprelink? Max

RE: Problems with kdevelop 1.4

2001-09-15 Thread Jarno Elonen
> I just installed kdevelop on my potato machine and have a problem > with the help system. kdevelop-setup tells me that it cannot find > htsearch > and therefor not create the index for the documentation. "apt-get install htdig" installs htsearch in "/usr/lib/cgi-bin/", from where kdevelop ca

Re: access to local Xserver?

2001-09-15 Thread Ben Burton
> I do have a problem though... when I 'su' as a regular user > i do not have access to the local Xserver to run X-programs. Check /etc/kde2/kdm/Xservers. If you see "-nolisten tcp" on the server line then you have TCP/IP access to the Xserver disabled. This became the default some time recentl

_Probably_ unrelated, but... (Re: Unix "lifetime-mail")

2001-09-15 Thread Chris Boyle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 15 Sep 2001 1:53 pm, J.R. ter Haseborg wrote: > does anyone know the kind of mail shown below? > It seems to be the unix time. > I receive this mails now and then and don't know which system service sends > this mails and why. Are you usin

Unix "lifetime-mail"

2001-09-15 Thread J . R . ter Haseborg
Hi, does anyone know the kind of mail shown below? It seems to be the unix time. I receive this mails now and then and don't know which system service sends this mails and why. Jan Remmer t.H. Example: -- Content-Type: Status: RO X-Status: O 1 1000502681.9146 -

Re: access to local Xserver?

2001-09-15 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Saturday 15 September 2001 10:19, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > btw, the simplest solution for transporting xauth data is to use ssh with > X forwarding enabled ... Yes, this is what i do when i remote login to the server at the university, but since the upgrade that did not work no more... I'll

Re: access to local Xserver?

2001-09-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> I do have a problem though... when I 'su' as a regular user > i do not have access to the local Xserver to run X-programs. > This worked before i upgraded to KDE2.2. I'm sure it is just > a setting somewhere, but i really do not know where to look... > it may be related to the Authorize setting

access to local Xserver?

2001-09-15 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, first of all i want to congratulate the packagers for their great effort in packaging KDE2.2! I do have a problem though... when I 'su' as a regular user i do not have access to the local Xserver to run X-programs. This worked before i upgraded to KDE2.2. I'm sure it is just a setting so