Package: libqt2.2
Severity: normal
This has been reported to the folks making the patch...I just want it
documented in the BTS.
Ivan
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:50:46PM +, Bart Oldeman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> these are surely related: after reading the changelog.Debian.gz for Qt and
> the behav
> these are surely related: after reading the changelog.Debian.gz for Qt and
> the behaviour I observed it became apparent. I fixed it for myself the
> Quick and Dirty way:
>
> replaced
> /usr/lib/qt2/lib/libqt.so.2.2.2
> with the version from
> libqt2.2_2%3a2.2.2-0.potato.1_i386.deb
>
> and Alt-
Hello,
these are surely related: after reading the changelog.Debian.gz for Qt and
the behaviour I observed it became apparent. I fixed it for myself the
Quick and Dirty way:
replaced
/usr/lib/qt2/lib/libqt.so.2.2.2
with the version from
libqt2.2_2%3a2.2.2-0.potato.1_i386.deb
and Alt-F2 did not s
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:29:58AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > I have a problem, since i've updated my Potato System last week.
> > Primary I use Gnome, but I also want to use some KDE-Applications.
> > My System: Debian 2.2 (all updates)
> >+ XFree86 4.0.1 (rebuild of Branden's
> I have a problem, since i've updated my Potato System last week.
> Primary I use Gnome, but I also want to use some KDE-Applications.
> My System: Debian 2.2 (all updates)
>+ XFree86 4.0.1 (rebuild of Branden's debs)
what version of the 4.0.1 debs??? I don't believe that the 4.0.1
Hello Linuxfriends,
I have a problem, since i've updated my Potato System last week.
Primary I use Gnome, but I also want to use some KDE-Applications.
My System: Debian 2.2 (all updates)
+ XFree86 4.0.1 (rebuild of Branden's debs)
First everything work well, but after an update I get
Hello,
I have got a big problem running KDE2 on a network-only machine.
When I start KDE, a kdeinit-process (the one starting kcminit) eats up all
my cpu-time and nothing more happens.
After killing this one, the startup continues and everything seems to run
fine, but only until I descide to ru
> Thanks for the quick response. I do want to say that I appreciate what
> you and all the other package maintainers do, the message was in no way aimed
> at slighting you or your work.
I know you weren't...
> I suppose the KDE web pages might have info on the individual packages?
> I should look
8 matches
Mail list logo