Re: Wiki page for requested packages

2007-02-26 Thread manfred
) [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Java/RequestedPackages Thanks. I added SQuirrel SQL and JEdit. Two great apps I use nearly every day. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
e problem exists because many libraries do dramatic changes to their API quite regularly .. manfred

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
like upstream and pumps stuff in ~/.m2 like normal. manfred

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
ns the quality of some of the artifacts up there with broken poms and so on. Trying to control it initially proofed to be too much work. If the upstream projects does not control it I would suggest that Debian packaging not waste the time either. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
e problems for upstream doing that since they might get bug reports from it. I think it would be better to just leave the version as is and accept that multiple version sit around on the file system. They don' cause any harm anyway. manfred

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
Debian packages. Yeah.. but Maven does not do all the nice integration like executable in /usr/bin, desktop icons, version upgrade notification and so on. Packaging the applications is still the way to go as far as I understand to get it to the end user in a seamless way. manfred

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
nd different programs were using different versions. JasperReports did the same. Manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
gh the pros and cons? I think multiple versions of a library is sometimes necessary but should be limited to where it is necessary. Just my 2c as an apprentice... there is lots to learn for me ;-) manfred

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-05 Thread manfred
ots of the people there Debian and Ubuntu users and are probably interested. http://www.nabble.com/Debian-package-of-Maven-2.0.5-tf3351107s177.html Thanks for the package. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-06 Thread manfred
ll the files you had to set up in /debian/ like rules and so on. Anyway... thanks for the discussion. Manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-09 Thread manfred
BS is mostly its source code. ;-) I will look at all that and try to create a package like that for some other software (probably Squirrel SQL) and probably bug you all with questions ;-) It will be a while though.. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: JavaME on Debian?

2007-04-03 Thread manfred
on a Java Developer Day in Vancouver and as far as I recall it was running on Linux. manfred

maven 2.0.6

2007-04-04 Thread manfred
Hi! I am just wondering if Michael Koch or somebody else has any plan to update the Maven 2.0.5 binary deb package to 2.0.6? manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A Java Packaging Wishlist

2007-05-22 Thread manfred
- jsrxxx-implementation manfred Quoting Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Excellent proposal! On 5/22/07, Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Late-night, random thoughts about what would be useful for us Debian Java packagers. Any comments? dh_installjars == A n

Re: A Java Packaging Wishlist

2007-05-22 Thread manfred
hat can be used for developing these features. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java policy and ABI changes

2007-05-24 Thread manfred
erent versions of various libraries in Debian in parallel. I do not think it will be possible to force all upstreams to always use the latest version (or most secure one or whatever.. how would you select anyway). Just my 2c (and definitely not more..) manfred

Re: Java policy and ABI changes

2007-05-25 Thread manfred
wise it would need to be possible to have different versions of the same package installed at the same time without file conflicts (which could be dealt with as suggested above). manfred

Re: Packaging solr:

2007-06-05 Thread manfred
and come up with a good plan for it. If we decide not to support this we will either end up with lots of packages we will create a LOT more work for us, since it is pretty common in the java world to depend on specific versions. Luckily with the classpath thats not an issue. manfred

Re: Packaging solr:

2007-06-05 Thread manfred
other option. You could just create a deb that violates the Debian Policy but is installable anyway. Problem might be that you have to have your own repo or some repo to host it at. You might be able to get it into Ubuntu. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: GNU/Linux Java Policy and Packaging

2007-06-14 Thread manfred
l.java/6537 Thanks for mentioning it. I second that notion. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNU/Linux Java Policy and Packaging

2007-06-15 Thread manfred
d in another thread [1]). Marcus [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.java/6537 Thanks for mentioning it. I second that notion. manfred We solved this by installing to /usr/share/- where slot is roughly the ABI (we increase it every time a new version breaks something using

Re: GNU/Linux Java Policy and Packaging

2007-06-15 Thread manfred
rallel? How do you handle man pages and all sorts of stuff like that (e.g. executable in /usr/bin has version number in command?) manfred It's not mandatory to install man pages on Gentoo but of course helpful for users. The thing is that besides the JDK itself I haven't see Java appli

Re: News on the Maven front

2010-06-22 Thread Manfred Moser
this on a wiki somewhere? Would also be good for the ubuntu and other crowds that use the debian tool chain. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

Re: How to apply maven build system

2011-02-16 Thread Manfred Moser
ir bit of complexity. I just checked.. it wont be that simple since it depends at least on org.freehep.graphics2d.VectorGraphics manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: How to apply maven build system

2011-02-16 Thread Manfred Moser
. manfred Here is a first cut of a pom file http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> 4.0.0 patristic

Re: How to apply maven build system (Was: How to use Debian packaged freehep instead of upstream provided freehep.jar)

2011-02-16 Thread Manfred Moser
> Hi, > > inspired by some hints about Java packaging I tried another package. It > is called patristic[1] (just another biological phylogeny software). It > comes just with a directory full of *.java files and the binary download > just tells in what directory layout the classes should end up.

Re: How to apply maven build system

2011-02-16 Thread Manfred Moser
> Giovanni Mascellani writes: > >> There's something funny about this command: I executed it and it had to >> download about 30 different files before being able to do something >> really dump (copy some simple templates in the working directory). > > Yeah, that's typical for Maven. It's absolute

Re: How to apply maven build system (Was: How to use Debian packaged freehep instead of upstream provided freehep.jar)

2011-02-16 Thread Manfred Moser
elease go to Maven central and not some website somewhere on the net. That way as a developer you dont have to worry about manually downloading from all over the place and monitoring sites all over the place. Maven encourages and supports proper process... but many people still just hack away.. manfre

Re: DebConf11: Java Team Meeting and Eclipse Packaging BoF

2011-07-27 Thread Manfred Moser
n the archive could and > should be automated. > > I've no idea how we should manage otherwise to get a substantial amount of > java libraries packaged. Maybe Maven central could get another public section exposed by the infrastructure that only contains Debian approved artifact

Re: Maven 3.x in experimental

2011-12-30 Thread Manfred Moser
etter than Maven 2 and I think it would be a great idea to make it the default replacing Maven 2 .. upstream has no development on Maven 2. manfred http://simpligility.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: New work on java-package

2012-03-19 Thread Manfred Moser
On 12-03-19 09:51 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 03/19/2012 02:04 PM, Barry Hawkins wrote: For example, JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA, one of the main IDEs for Java development, still doesn't endorse the use of OpenJDK. If you download IDEA and launch it via a terminal, you will see the following warning:

Re: OT: Usage of language-specific package managers

2012-03-26 Thread Manfred Moser
applies to Debian in the sense that it needs to build from source and be offline.. but more and more that is unrealistic imho. It might be a great idea to provide a Maven package that is completely compatible as an alternative to the Debian internal one in some outside repo. Manfred http://simpligility.com

Re: FYI: Java cli option parsing in Debian

2012-05-18 Thread Manfred Moser
t; > Jcommander's documentation looks more inviting. So I'll start with that > one. > > Regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro Good choice. I played with it before and it is quite nice. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Frustration with trying to build Debian packages from Maven-based sources

2013-03-18 Thread Manfred Moser
+Guide If there is interest in the debian community to have a controlled repository server running that only provides approved jars you could run Sonatype Professsional. As an open source project you could get a free license. If there is any interest in that please contact me at manf...@sonatype.co

Re: Frustration with trying to build Debian packages from Maven-based sources

2013-03-18 Thread Manfred Moser
> Le 18/03/2013 22:44, Manfred Moser a écrit : > >> If there is interest in the debian community to have a controlled >> repository server running that only provides approved jars you could run >> Sonatype Professsional. As an open source project you could get a free >

Re: Maven 2 vs Maven 3 plugins

2013-05-29 Thread Manfred Moser
> Le 29/05/2013 16:22, Manfred Moser a écrit : > >> Imho we should sort out all situations where people think they have to >> stick to Maven 2, migrate them and then deprecate support for Maven 2. > > I personally stick to Maven 2 because I need the uniqueVersion feature

Re: Maven 2 vs Maven 3 plugins

2013-05-29 Thread Manfred Moser
> Le 29/05/2013 16:46, Manfred Moser a écrit : > >> Can you clarify the details of what you mean with that? > > See: > https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html#Maven3.xCompatibilityNotes-NonuniqueSnapshotDeployments > > I can no longer deploy non

Re: Maven 2 vs Maven 3 plugins

2013-05-29 Thread Manfred Moser
* maven-install-plugin: for Maven 3 > > What do you think? Imho we should sort out all situations where people think they have to stick to Maven 2, migrate them and then deprecate support for Maven 2. manfred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &

Re: Maven 2 vs Maven 3 plugins

2013-05-29 Thread Manfred Moser
> Le 29/05/2013 17:06, Manfred Moser a écrit : > >> What are you deploying to if you are not using a repo manager? > > I simply deploy to a remote server via SSH. The artifacts are served by > Apache. Ah... ouch. >> And why not use e.g. Nexus and just have the snaps

Re: maven2 for Debian

2007-03-04 Thread Manfred Moser
ing system? And a last one.. have you announced the package on the maven lists? manfred -- Manfred Moser Vancouver Island Java User Group http://www.mosabuam.com/vijug skype: mosabua http://www.linkedin.com/in/manfredmoser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of &q

JavaOne

2007-05-04 Thread Manfred Moser
too. manfred -- Manfred Moser Vancouver Island Java User Group http://www.mosabuam.com/vijug skype: mosabua http://www.linkedin.com/in/manfredmoser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JavaOne

2007-05-04 Thread Manfred Moser
On Friday May 4 2007, David Herron wrote: > Manfred Moser wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Just wondering if anybody on the list will be at JavaOne next > > week and if there is some sort of meeting I could attend. I would > > love to meet some of you. > > > >

Re: A Java Packaging Wishlist

2007-05-22 Thread Manfred Moser
aim at an earlier stage here as far as I understand it would actually be feasible to use the binary package for developing these processes now. Anyway.. just an idea. Integrating maven will include lots of other tasks like a debian build system private repository and so on. manfred -- Ma

Re: A Java Packaging Wishlist

2007-05-22 Thread Manfred Moser
t; earlier this month about "java dependency substvars"? I missed that discussion. I do assume that with some sort of lookup list of "debian" approved/included dependencies even that might be possible. Certainly something to be considered as a second step once the creation

Re: Getting Maven Into Main - What Next?

2007-05-25 Thread Manfred Moser
ne that the Debian team is packaging Maven and he was astonished and delighted. He or somebody else might be able to give a good tip here and there. I hope this helps a bit. manfred -- Manfred Moser http://www.mosabuam.com skype: mosabua http://www.linkedin.com/in/manfredmoser -- To U

Re: A Java Packaging Wishlist

2007-05-26 Thread Manfred Moser
g the package from the upstream source. The information in the pom can be used to derive a lot of data in the debian control files. In addition when another version is available from upstream the pom content can be verified back into the control files to do amendments. That wont be fully automat

Re: Java policy and ABI changes

2007-05-26 Thread Manfred Moser
re are valid reasons to support the old and the new API at the same time. manfred -- Manfred Moser http://www.mosabuam.com skype: mosabua http://www.linkedin.com/in/manfredmoser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Getting Maven Into Main - What Next?

2007-05-26 Thread Manfred Moser
look forward to the progress. I wish I could help more but time is very short at the moment... at least I hope to be able to help by giving my input. manfred -- Manfred Moser http://www.mosabuam.com skype: mosabua http://www.linkedin.com/in/manfredmoser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]