Where is $JAVA_HOME/lib ?

2007-05-08 Thread jim
Foundation, Inc. java.home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/jre gnu.classpath.home=/usr gnu.classpath.home.url=file:///usr/lib/../lib any hints would be appreciated.. thanks jim [0] http://csi.business.gov.au/CSI/CsiInstallForLinux.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: tomcat4 and apache1.3.x not talking to each other

2003-11-16 Thread Jim McLaughlin
You might need to uncomment the servlet mapping for the invoker servlet in /etc/tomcat4/web.xml . hth, jim At precisely Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:23:57 -0700 "J. R. Westmoreland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running apache 1.3.29-1 with tomcat4 and I have the connector ins

JIKES and Xemacs

1999-08-19 Thread Jim Franklin
Hi folks I was wondering if anyone knew how to parse debugger messages when using JIKES in Xemacs? Jim Franklin

[Fwd: [phxjug-java] PVCj 1.2 released (Open Source)]

1999-08-20 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- Hi folks, Just a quick announcement to let you know that there's a new version of PVCj available which works with the newest versions of Java Plugin (1.2). For those who have no idea what I am talking about, PVCj (Plugin Version Control for Java) is a free tool which enable

Re: Debian Java outlook

1999-09-10 Thread Jim Franklin
a system of handling bugs as quickly and effectively as possible. Why have just a maintainer to a package? Why not a maintainer and a couple of apprentice developers that the maintainer trusts, etc. This is just a simple form of possibles. I'm sure you all know variations of the same. I hope

Re: Debian Java outlook

1999-09-13 Thread Jim Franklin
Hi Stephane, It has been my experience that there are two types of engineers in the world. The ones who tell you why something can't be done and the ones who make the concept happen. My letter to you folks was to open up possibilities. Good luck. Jim Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: &g

Re: JFORK: Or a reasonable response to the Sun SCSL

1999-09-15 Thread Jim Franklin
Hi John, I've been following debian-hurd myself the last few months. If you could send some URLs, other than the usual hurd ones, on the hurd architecture(translators,etc) and perhaps detail your thoughts on a HURD VM (eg cross-platform, structure, etc), I would be very interested. Jim

Re: JFORK: Or a reasonable response to the Sun SCSL

1999-09-15 Thread Jim Franklin
Hi Seth, I think HURD has potential from the fact that it is an operating system rather than a language. Implementation of the java 2.0 specs may not be constrained by sun's license, although I'm not sure. Jim Seth R Arnold wrote: > > John, there is one point you raised I am

["Ben Bederson" ] ANNOUNCE: Jazz 0.6beta (Pad++ successor)

1999-10-01 Thread Jim Pick
Hi, I remember playing with Pad++ back in the early days of Gnome - it was really cool (but proprietary). Somebody should check this out - it's been rewritten in Java and it's now under the MPL. Cheers, - Jim --- Begin Message --- Hello Pad++ friends, It has been a long time sin

[Fwd: IBM Announces New Java 1.1.8 for Linux]

1999-10-19 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- Thought you should know... Now there's Java performance on Linux that's as fast as on Windows IBM has released its latest Java port for Linux, the Java 1.1.8 IBM Developer Kit for Linux. An alpha version of the Developer Kit has been available for download from alphaWorks f

[Fwd: Plugged In Releases Open Source Web RAD Tool]

1999-10-22 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- Hi all, Those of you who are into the Enhydra Java/XML application server might also be interested in Plugged In's new project. We released our Platypus Toolset (basically a Java code generator for Enhydra) under the GNU LGPL license today. Please see http://www.PIsoftware

[Fwd: Microkernel advocacy]

1999-10-29 Thread Jim Franklin
The microkernel OS they are speaking of is the HURD. Jim--- Begin Message --- On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 07:00:17AM -0400, Leimy wrote: > Does all of this mean that JAVA could run closer to the kernel (at least > relative to other languages in different operating systems) in a > microkerne

Hurd and Java[FW]

1999-11-05 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- Nic Ferrier wrote: > > Does the Hurd support Java yet? It's the other way round: Does any Java Interpreter does support the Hurd? I don't know. > via Kaffe? I suggest get the source and try it out, then let us know. Thanks, Marcus --- End Message ---

Re: Hurd and Java[FW]

1999-11-08 Thread Jim Franklin
B, one of the Hurd developers mentioned that java could be run as a transparent layer with the Hurd translators. Hopefully this correspondence can continue and be of benefit to all involved. Luck to all. Jim > > S

Java on HURD, success[Fwd: ]

2000-01-02 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- I've attempted to run a Java Virtual Machine under the Hurd, i chose Kaffe which appeared to be the most advanced of the open source JVMs. I got the Kaffe-1.0.5 source from www.transvirtual.com, and of course it didn't compile right out of the box. First I had to get conf

Re: Java on HURD, success[Fwd: ]

2000-01-08 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 10:26:24PM -0500, Igor Khavkine wrote: > However, I also tried compiling jikes and jikespg packages for the Hurd. > jikespg compiled without problems and jikes needed a patch which has already > been merged with the upstream source (Marcus, you can a

someone could port libgc[Fwd: ]

2000-01-12 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:15:58AM -0500, Derek L Davies wrote: > > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [snip] > > > I don't know what gcj is, have to check, but we will have kaffee someday > > > sooner or later. I am not sure what you

someone could port libgc[Fwd: 2]

2000-01-13 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:18:43AM -0700, Jim Franklin wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > here a quick URL to gcj > > In Debian, gcj is part of gcc 2.95. So I think we should take a look at that > soon. > gcc 2.95.2 built OK

panic: zalloc[Fwd:]

2000-01-24 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- I've been testing my Kaffe build under the Hurd. Most simple java programs run fine, however there still are plenty ones that dont. While trying to debug test cases, one program once run consistently make gnumach issue a "panic: zalloc" and crash. I've been able to place

ignore panic: zalloc

2000-01-24 Thread Jim Franklin
Sorry folks, This seems to be a microkernel problem as opposed to java problem. Once again my apologies for sending this through. Jim

Kaffe on GNU Hurd[Fwd: ]

2000-03-07 Thread Jim Franklin
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --- Begin Message --- --- End Message ---

Forte for Java Open source announcement[Fwd: [phxjug-java] Fwd: ]

2000-03-15 Thread Jim Franklin
--- Begin Message --- X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:50:28 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Cecile Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Fo

JSP error on simple page.

2000-10-26 Thread Jim Brennan
in advance for any info, Jim Brennan

Java error in Mozilla

2001-10-31 Thread Jim Shofstall
Could somebody here kindly check out Debian Bug #114265 INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: Could not load /usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libjavaplugin_oji.so: linking error=/usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libjavaplugin_oji.so: undefined symbol: XtShellStrings System error?:: Invalid argument The Mozilla

Re: Java error in Mozilla

2001-11-11 Thread Jim Shofstall
Upgraded Mozilla to 0.9.5-5_i386.deb Upgraded JAVA to j2sdk1.3.3.1-1_i386.deb Everything appears to be working fine now ... Browser boots and Java loads. Thanks Juergen, Jim On 2001.11.08 08:51 Juergen Kreileder wrote: Please upgrade to 1.3.1 and see if the problem still exists. Juergen

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
what's missing from kaffe so I can update the "projects" page on the website. Cheers, - Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kaffe and Java2

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
ec (but technically, we're not Java, since that's a registered trademark of Sun, and neither are we Java2). Kaffe already has some Java2 stuff implemented in it. Cheers, - Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
ces them: > >http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg. unimplemented APIs, etc), there was a "wishlist" bug filed against kaffe stating

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
y a bit klunky for the users, who have to put up with long compiles during install, but it does take the load off of the maintainers to have to precompile their stuff for multiple targets. Cheers, - Jim On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 16:28, Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Andrew&

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
Usually, the main problems you will see are with incomplete or missing API implementations, and the occasional bug. Kaffe hasn't had a new release in 2 years, but there has been work on the CVS version. As I'm the new guy running the project, I'm going to try to get a release o

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 18:29, Per Bothner wrote: > Jim Pick wrote: > > Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses > > for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time > > compilation (.java to .so) at install time.

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 17:16, Adam Heath wrote: > On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote: > > > Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each > > package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg. > > unimplemented APIs, etc)

Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.)

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
FreeStandards.org. Theoretically, I suspect even the JCP could be used to host such a project, right under Sun's nose, but I suspect that there would be issues with the whole premise of the project (to promote free software implementations and APIs that in some cases, compete with Sun&#

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-06-28 Thread Jim Pick
Cool. Looks like a lot of work. :-) I'll have to give 'em a try (and eventually, with Kaffe). Cheers, - Jim On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 18:33, Adam Heath wrote: > I am proud to announce that I have finally finished(well, close enough, > anyways) the debs of JBoss(www.jboss.org)

OpenOffice?

2002-06-29 Thread Jim Pick
;s non-free (so OpenOffice can't be build with the core set of Debian packages). I don't have time to look at it, but it would be nice to know if Kaffe could be used instead... Cheers, - Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [kaffe] Re: OpenOffice?

2002-06-29 Thread Jim White
Rene Engelhard wrote: Jim Pick wrote: Here's a little project for somebody. ... I don't have time to look at it, but it would be nice to know if Kaffe could be used instead... Well, I assume you mean "little" in jest. Building OpenOffice is never a small thing (the full build

JSP error on simple page.

2000-10-26 Thread Jim Brennan
in advance for any info, Jim Brennan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Java error in Mozilla

2001-10-31 Thread Jim Shofstall
Could somebody here kindly check out Debian Bug #114265 > INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: > Could not load /usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libjavaplugin_oji.so: > linking error=/usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libjavaplugin_oji.so: > undefined symbol: XtShellStrings > System error?:: Invalid argument

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
what's missing from kaffe so I can update the "projects" page on the website. Cheers, - Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kaffe and Java2

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
ec (but technically, we're not Java, since that's a registered trademark of Sun, and neither are we Java2). Kaffe already has some Java2 stuff implemented in it. Cheers, - Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
ces them: > >http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg. unimplemented APIs, etc), there was a "wishlist" bug filed against kaffe stating

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
y a bit klunky for the users, who have to put up with long compiles during install, but it does take the load off of the maintainers to have to precompile their stuff for multiple targets. Cheers, - Jim On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 16:28, Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Andrew&

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
Usually, the main problems you will see are with incomplete or missing API implementations, and the occasional bug. Kaffe hasn't had a new release in 2 years, but there has been work on the CVS version. As I'm the new guy running the project, I'm going to try to get a release o

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 18:29, Per Bothner wrote: > Jim Pick wrote: > > Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses > > for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time > > compilation (.java to .so) at install time.

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 17:16, Adam Heath wrote: > On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote: > > > Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each > > package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg. > > unimplemented APIs, etc)

Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.)

2002-05-12 Thread Jim Pick
FreeStandards.org. Theoretically, I suspect even the JCP could be used to host such a project, right under Sun's nose, but I suspect that there would be issues with the whole premise of the project (to promote free software implementations and APIs that in some cases, compete with Sun&#

OpenOffice?

2002-06-29 Thread Jim Pick
;s non-free (so OpenOffice can't be build with the core set of Debian packages). I don't have time to look at it, but it would be nice to know if Kaffe could be used instead... Cheers, - Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [kaffe] Re: OpenOffice?

2002-06-29 Thread Jim White
Rene Engelhard wrote: > Jim Pick wrote: > >>Here's a little project for somebody. >>... >>I don't have time to look at it, but it would be nice to know if Kaffe >>could be used instead... Well, I assume you mean "little" in jest. Building Open

Re: as the worst

2005-06-11 Thread Jim Jarvis
://www.fundingtalk.com/index.php?refid=windsor We look forward to helping you secure your future. --Jim Jarvis Financial Analyst - LRA Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know so you won't recieve again: http://www.fundingtalk.com/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]