JJAR

2001-11-11 Thread Ryan Shaw
regarding the recent classpath/versioned jars/dependencies discussion: the jakarta apache project is working on a solution to this, a CPAN-like system for java called JJAR. they have a simple working prototype. it is still in the early stages of development. since debian folk are probably the world

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-18 Thread Ryan Shaw
doxygen can also generate very nice documentation from java src with javadoc comments. in fact, i prefer its output to javadoc. you can even include hyperlinked source excerpts in the docs, which is *very* nice. doxygen is in unstable and maybe testing, i think. Stefan wrote: ||| Takashi Okamoto

Re: Doxygen (Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source))

2002-02-18 Thread Ryan Shaw
Hmmm...I haven't had any problems with HTML in documentation blocks...but I don't know if I've specifically used . Are you sure that you have it configured for Java-style documentation? It also can be used for C++ styles, so maybe it is misinterpreting the documentation blocks. Or maybe you found

JJAR

2001-11-11 Thread Ryan Shaw
regarding the recent classpath/versioned jars/dependencies discussion: the jakarta apache project is working on a solution to this, a CPAN-like system for java called JJAR. they have a simple working prototype. it is still in the early stages of development. since debian folk are probably the wor

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-18 Thread Ryan Shaw
doxygen can also generate very nice documentation from java src with javadoc comments. in fact, i prefer its output to javadoc. you can even include hyperlinked source excerpts in the docs, which is *very* nice. doxygen is in unstable and maybe testing, i think. Stefan wrote: ||| Takashi Okamot

Re: Doxygen (Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source))

2002-02-18 Thread Ryan Shaw
Hmmm...I haven't had any problems with HTML in documentation blocks...but I don't know if I've specifically used . Are you sure that you have it configured for Java-style documentation? It also can be used for C++ styles, so maybe it is misinterpreting the documentation blocks. Or maybe you foun