Re: A suggestion to list core classes

> I don't see the need for /etc/java-core-classes. Every VM should be > able to find its core classes without it. This implies that there > should be no need to put core classes into CLASSPATH. 1. Some (many?) compilers don't provide their own core classes, and need the location of core cla

Re: Java 1.2 & 1.3 'in' testing

On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:00:42PM +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Uptill then, it would at least say that Debian *is* Java 1.3 aware and solve > that OpenOffice discussion on debian-devel The installer *btw* could go > into main, i guess... is that true? I haven't checked what the strict re

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 04:13:31PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Joe Emenaker wrote: > > [...] > > Well, each JVM on the system could have a script that builds the classpath > > that it needs. That would be the first thing in the actual classpath passed > > to the JVM. Next, you t

Re: A suggestion to list core classes

> I don't see the need for /etc/java-core-classes. Every VM should be > able to find its core classes without it. This implies that there > should be no need to put core classes into CLASSPATH. 1. Some (many?) compilers don't provide their own core classes, and need the location of core cl

Re: Java 1.2 & 1.3 'in' testing

On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:00:42PM +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Uptill then, it would at least say that Debian *is* Java 1.3 aware and solve > that OpenOffice discussion on debian-devel The installer *btw* could go > into main, i guess... is that true? I haven't checked what the strict r

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 04:13:31PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Joe Emenaker wrote: > > [...] > > Well, each JVM on the system could have a script that builds the classpath > > that it needs. That would be the first thing in the actual classpath passed > > to the JVM. Next, you