Stefano Maffulli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked me the following question,
after being asked about Java peer-to-peer software. I will mention
bittorrent to him as something to look into. I don't know the answer
to the jxta part, so I'd appreciate it if anyone on debian-java could
cc him a reply.
Hi all,
I was just reading the bug list email and I spotted two java packages
are marked for removal from testing. I don't really use java much
myself these days, so I thought I'd wave them at this list.
orp is being removed because of a bug that looks quite fully diagnosed
at http://bugs.deb
Stefano Maffulli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked me the following question,
after being asked about Java peer-to-peer software. I will mention
bittorrent to him as something to look into. I don't know the answer
to the jxta part, so I'd appreciate it if anyone on debian-java could
cc him a reply.
Hi all,
I was just reading the bug list email and I spotted two java packages
are marked for removal from testing. I don't really use java much
myself these days, so I thought I'd wave them at this list.
orp is being removed because of a bug that looks quite fully diagnosed
at http://bugs.debi
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler,
> java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre,
> classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for
> non-free implementations. More informations on
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MJ Ray a Âcrit :
> [...]
> > A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> > Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> > I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
