is error, can you help
> fixing this?
I'll also check these, but help might be needed. My Java knowledge is
very rusty.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
* Omry Yadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-01 15:12:28 +0200]:
> how can I install java applications (tomcat, azaeurus etc) through apt?
apt-get install tomcat4
Azaeurus is not available as .deb AFAIK.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
27; thing, where
everywhere means the supported platforms, not every archs+os that exist
around. Anyway, *BSD has Java as well, see http://www.freebsd.org/java/
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
o everyone, yes. You really
should read the license[1][2].
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
[2] /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 @ base-files
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
"Source Code
The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in
source code as well as compiled form."
Sorry if I missed the point that the source is available for JRockit.
I am completely unexperienced with legal stuff, so I may be wrong; so
debian-devel@ would be a better place to talk about this
license/agreement.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
Hi Johan,
* Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-05 06:42:33 -0700]:
> as I wrote in my very first e-mail about JRockit, it's non-free, and
> will remain so for the foreseeable future. Thus, the only way it would
> enter Debian would be through the non-free part of the Debian distro.
>
>
* Omry Yadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-05 20:36:28 +0200]:
> Shouldn't the list allow only subscribed users to use it?
You are right; there are big flames about it on every Debian mailing
lists. Still Debian's policy is to remain open, and do not make barriers
to people trying to report a bug
Hi,
I read the Java policy, but I has not became more wise. Say, I have a
complex application, which licensed under GPL v2. But it does not
compile with free tools. The JVM is not a problem, as Debian has
j2sdk1.4, but what's if the application needs SUN's JavaMail as well?
What should I write to
Bonjour Daniel,
* Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-04 19:48:31 +0200]:
> Szia Laszlo!
Parlez-vous Hongroise?
> No it doesn't, and it cannot for licensing reasons.
I tought there is some kind of wrapper, which downloads SUN's J2SDK and
installs it for the user; so Debian does not viol
* Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-15 12:43:17 +0200]:
> I suggest that you contact the upstream author with this info, and see if
> he can get rid of the dependency.
Just asked. Hopefully they will move on. Please note that 'he' equals
to Novell Inc.
> If you have problems, feel fre
y strange for me.
> Is there any chance to have a non-Sun implementation of com.sun.*?
Well, as discussed I have asked upstream (who uses com.sun.mail.*) to
change their code. If they don't do it, I think I will be forced to do
that on my own.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
working?
"""
What should I answer? Is GNU JavaMail really *working*? I do not know
how complete is it, looking at the homepage[1], could not figure it out.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/classpathx/javamail/javamail.html
ions.
> To get you a easier way in: have a look at the clean target and the
> debhelper.in rules. cdbs knowledge won't hurt either, as there are a
> few hacks in the package to work around cdbs shortcomings.
Was the original rules so complicated? cdbs may tie you in several
things when you have to be flexible for such a big application.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
n find the time somewhen to look into this. Shame on me, but now I
am going to check the newly released stable Sun J2SE 1.5.0[1].
Off: to whom should I whine that BEA is no longer send me invitations
about conferences etc? :)
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp
14 matches
Mail list logo
