Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 09:59]: > > >>> Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Dec-00 3:28:18 PM >>> > > >So, in the control file i'd like to be able to specify "requires: > > >java-servlet-engine" and let apt get on with it, rather than > > >sa

Re: javadoc: error - Error fetching URL: file:/usr/share/doc/default-jdk/api/

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:54:05PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Control: tags -1 + help > > Le 13/06/2018 à 22:42, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > > Control: reopen -1 > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:39:07AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > >

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 09:59]: > > >>> Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Dec-00 3:28:18 PM >>> > > >So, in the control file i'd like to be able to specify "requires: > > >java-servlet-engine" and let apt get on with it, rather than > > >s

Re: Bug#639954: azureus: FTBFS (multiarch breakage)

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Adrian, > > Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in this > case with debian-java) : >... I am not doing mass bug filing, I just sent bug reports for the two packages where I personally ran int

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > [removed the Python 2 bits] > > On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Package: debian-security-support > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org > > > openjdk-15 will be included

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:47:14PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > I think nobody wants to switch default-jdk to 17 or even not ship > > 11 at all any more or stop supporting it during bullseye’s lifetime. > > Maybe that also wa

Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:44:11PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >... > Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2020, 16:15 -0500 schrieb Louis-Philippe Véronneau: >... > > Adrian Bunk says a large part of the Java ecosystem seems to > > transitively depend on jruby, so I guess all those thi

OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports

The problem: OpenJDK 11 LTS is the default JDK in both buster and bullseye. The next LTS OpenJDK 17 is already in unstable, but it will not even have a stable release by the time bullseye releases. OpenJDK 17 is expected to be the OpenJDK in bookworm. Some users will want to use OpenJDK 17 on

Bug#1040181: openjdk-8: Please disable tests on zero architectures

Source: openjdk-8 Version: 8u382~b04-1 Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: Thorsten Glaser Zero is slow, OpenJDK has many tests, and on slower ports architectures the build can literally take a month: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openjdk-8&arch=alpha Please fix this wi