Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

2023-03-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >jtreg6 (in line with jtreg6 packaging which kept jtreg changelog). Was >it a correct thing to do, or should it be truncated? You can keep it; debhelper can now truncate it. >I could not find an ITP bug for jtreg6, does it mean that there is >some other

Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

2023-03-14 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi, Thank you very much! Since I can not upload I will file the ITP then. Would it be ok to keep ownership with the Debian Java Team in line with jtreg6? Best Regards, Vladimir. On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:29 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > >jtr

Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

2023-03-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >Since I can not upload I will file the ITP then. Depends on your sponsor, whether they insist on one. But, go ahead. >Would it be ok to >keep ownership with the Debian Java Team in line with jtreg6? Usual procedure is that for team-maintained packages