Hello,
Maintainer of antlr4-cpp-runtime here.
On 2021-07-28 22:36, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> 2) Do "$something-else" for all these packages to stay in sync - again,
> probably bumping versions only when needed.
> With this approach, I do not see a problem in introducing a Go runtime
> source package
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 03:09 Andrius Merkys wrote:
>
> Maybe an antlr4 packaging team could be set up to coordinate
> synchronized version bumps?
>
That sounds like a good compromise. And this way the Security Team would
have a single contact if there's a security issue.
-Olek
Hi Andrius,
> Hello,
> Maintainer of antlr4-cpp-runtime here.
>
>On 2021-07-28 22:36, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> 2) Do "$something-else" for all these packages to stay in sync - again,
>> probably bumping versions only when needed.
>> With this approach, I do not see a problem in introducing a Go run
openjdk-8_8u302-b08-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
openjdk-8_8u302-b08-1.dsc
openjdk-8_8u302-b08.orig.tar.gz
openjdk-8_8u302-b08-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Le 2021-07-28 21:36, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
Thoughts?
I think you are trying to find a solution for a problem that doesn't
exist.
Source packages per language isn't an issue that needs to be fixed.
antlr4-cpp-runtime works fine, python3-antlr4 works fine,
libantlr4-runtime-java
works fine,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:45:23 +0200
Source: openjdk-8
Architecture: source
Version: 8u302-b08-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Java Maintenance
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser
Changes:
openjdk-8 (8u302-b
Le 2021-07-28 17:08, tony mancill a écrit :
I don't disagree with Emmanuel's statements about the importance of
ANTLR and why it is helpful to maintain separation. However, I don't
think introducing a separate source package each language ecosystem is
necessarily best for Debian.
It's not opt
7 matches
Mail list logo
