I can make it!
Raman Sarda:
Count me in too.
On 23 March 2021 1:09:18 am IST, Manas Kashyap
wrote:
I am in for monthly meeting.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, 1:08 AM Samyak Jain wrote:
Hello, Teams!
I hope everyone is doing well.
The last Thursday of this month is about to knock on the doors
Hi Samyak,
I'm going to try to attend on behalf of the Debian Bazel team. As Bazel in
Debian matures, I'm interested to know how our team can help to support
yours!
-Olek
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 3:38 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
> Hello, Teams!
>
> I hope everyone is doing well.
>
> The last Thursday
> I hope everyone is doing well.
>
> The last Thursday of this month is about to knock on the doorstep. Hence, the
> time for the meet \0/
> More precisely, the sixth monthly meeting is scheduled for March 25, 14:00
> UTC (Thursday).
>
> Please acknowledge by replying to the same thread who all
Le 24/03/2021 à 19:33, Sunil Mohan Adapa a écrit :
> As one of the items on the agenda, I would like to us to discuss how to
> deal with the removal of openjdk-8 from Debian[3].
openjdk-8 has already been removed from the Debian stable releases. It's
still in unstable to help with the bootstrappi
On 24/03/21 1:23 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 24/03/2021 à 19:33, Sunil Mohan Adapa a écrit :
>
>> As one of the items on the agenda, I would like to us to discuss how to
>> deal with the removal of openjdk-8 from Debian[3].
>
> openjdk-8 has already been removed from the Debian stable releases
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> openjdk-8 has already been removed from the Debian stable releases. It's
> still in unstable to help with the bootstrapping of Kotlin. Until the
It's not, it was removed because it still B-D'd on gcc 9.
I tried to organise updating OpenJDK 8 with Tiag
Le 24/03/2021 à 21:29, Sunil Mohan Adapa a écrit :
> openjdk-8 appears to been removed from unstable recently[1][2].
Sorry I misunderstood your message, I didn't realize it got kicked
already :(
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/03/2021 à 22:13, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> I can certainly bring it back to unstable, built with
> gcc 10, if there are no major issues involved in making
> it build with GCC 10, if there is interest.
We are certainly doomed without openjdk-8 in unstable, we really need it
back.
Emmanuel
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 24/03/2021 à 22:13, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> > I can certainly bring it back to unstable, built with
> > gcc 10, if there are no major issues involved in making
> > it build with GCC 10, if there is interest.
>
> We are certainly doomed without
Le 24/03/2021 à 23:03, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Hmmm, considering… does this also mean I’ll need to figure out
> how to bootstrap it using JDK 11 as bootstrap compiler? Probably…
> anyway, this will take a while.
Good point, if it doesn't build with OpenJDK 11 I suggest building with
the lates
10 matches
Mail list logo
