Hi Matthias,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 2/12/21 10:26 PM, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> >
> > Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
>
> you could try to debug with java -zero / javac -J-zero on amd64.
>
Sure! What does that flag do, anyway? Something
It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el.
https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/
Raphael
Olek Wojnar wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 2/12/21 10:26 PM, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> >
> > Any insights or suggestions would b
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I’ve just committed a rather important bugfix for tomcat9 to git
> > (administrators no longer could read the logfiles).
>
> Good catch. This was fixed in tomcat9/9.0.37-1 last summer but sysvinit
> systems without systemd-tmpfiles are still affected
Hi Thorsten,
Le 2021-02-13 06:42, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
I’ve just committed a rather important bugfix for tomcat9 to git
(administrators no longer could read the logfiles).
Good catch. This was fixed in tomcat9/9.0.37-1 last summer but sysvinit
systems without systemd-tmpfiles are still
Hi,
This particular exception is being thrown by the call to unlinkat [1]
which calls native unlinkat. Man page for unlinkat describes EISDIR
error [2] as:
"EISDIR pathname refers to a directory, and AT_REMOVEDIR was not
specified in flags."
Assuming unlinkat is telling the truth and this is inde
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tiago Daitx wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This particular exception is being thrown by the call to unlinkat [1]
> which calls native unlinkat. Man page for unlinkat describes EISDIR
> error [2] as:
> "EISDIR pathname refers to a directory, and AT_REMOVEDIR was not
> specified
6 matches
Mail list logo
