Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the > > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regress

Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in > >

Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:34:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] > > > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrot

Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, tony mancill wrote: > Given that the JVM bug can affect any application seems to tilt the > scale towards proceeding with the JDK update, so the release of an > upgrade path for Jenkins is a relief. How about versioning it differently? Make it 11.0.9-2 for a while? Convince up