Hi again,
Dominik Stadler commented here:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/netlib-java/commit/da4055377617ea59e92675088be41600e16a326d#note_70898
on my patch. I admit I feel really bad about my patch since I do not
want to override an existing compile target. So I rephrase: Why is the
co
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the tomcat8 package from testing and unstable (not experimental).
This package has been replaced by tomcat9 for Buster.
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Please remove the tomcat8 package from testing and unstable (not
> experimental). This package has been replaced by tomcat9 for Buster.
Please don’t, tomcat9 has no sysvinit script, and you did
not like any of my suggestions for it.
bye,
//mirabilos
-
Hi Thorsten,
Le 25/03/2019 à 14:17, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Please don’t, tomcat9 has no sysvinit script, and you did
> not like any of my suggestions for it.
I don't mind if tomcat8 is released with Buster, but I won't be able to
commit any time on the security fixes. Do you volunteer? The
Control: tags -1 patch
Hello Andreas,
I am attaching a patch that seems to fix the problem. This patch can be
applied on top of the current version in testing, no further changes are
required, but please double-check if the r-deps continue to work. At
least the classes are generated again.
The b
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:53:03PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> Le 25/03/2019 à 14:17, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> > Please don’t, tomcat9 has no sysvinit script, and you did
> > not like any of my suggestions for it.
>
> I don't mind if tomcat8 is released with Buster, but
Thinking about it, the patch could be much simpler. Actually all you
need is the list of URLs. They are hardcoded but those jar files and
your build directory probably will never change again. It looks like
netlib-java is unmaintained and changes are unlikely. Please find
attached the updated vers
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> Le 25/03/2019 à 14:17, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> > Please don’t, tomcat9 has no sysvinit script, and you did
> > not like any of my suggestions for it.
>
> I don't mind if tomcat8 is released with Buster, but I won't be able to
>
On Monday, March 25, 2019 02:17:15 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Please remove the tomcat8 package from testing and unstable (not
> > experimental). This package has been replaced by tomcat9 for Buster.
>
> Please don’t, tomcat9 has no sysvinit script,
clone 925454 -1
reassign -1 tomcat9
found -1 9.0.16-3
retitle -1 tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”)
severity -1 serious
tags -1 = confirmed
outlook -1 working on it within the week --mirabilos
owner -1 t...@mirbsd.de
thanks
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Isn't
Le 25/03/2019 à 16:09, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> But somehow, I think the “let’s add a sensible init script to
> tomcat9 now” is the better solution for everyone. Emmanuel, can
> you please reconsider your rejection? Then we can ask SRM if
> they’d allow it.
We've got two serious security issue
Le 25/03/2019 à 16:33, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Oh, goodie. I had not realised this is, as the init system diversity GR
> did not pass, still a “must”.
>
> In this case it’s easy… I’m cloning this as RC bug against tomcat9 and
> will work within the next couple of days on fixing this by provid
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> We've got two serious security issues in the Tomcat init script in the
You told me this. I replied by:
• I’m active and willing to maintain it
• if I don’t realise there’s a bug you can ping me
• if even that fails, you can *still* remove it
You neve
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> When it's ready please let me review the update before uploading.
OK.
> Not changing the maintainer scripts nor the configuration files in the
> process would be nice.
I agree; at the current point in time, this should be least-intrusive.
bye,
//mir
14 matches
Mail list logo
