Re: knopflerfish-osgi 6.1.0 (java9)

Felix Natter writes: > hello debian-java, > > --- a/osgi/framework/build.xml > +++ b/osgi/framework/build.xml > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > > > > - location="${topdir}/annotations/osgi.annotation-6.0.1.jar"/> > + location="/usr/share/java/osgi.annotation.jar"/> > > > > But I still get

Why dependency on both default-jre and java-runtime

Hi I was going through the pkg-java policy and found this [1]: Programs must depend on the needed runtime environment (default-jre or default-jre-headless if need a GUI or not, and java-runtime or java-runtime-headless as provided by alternative Java environments). However, java-

Re: Why dependency on both default-jre and java-runtime

Hi, Am 23.08.2017 um 20:11 schrieb Carnë Draug: > Hi > > I was going through the pkg-java policy and found this [1]: > > Programs must depend on the needed runtime environment > (default-jre or default-jre-headless if need a GUI or not, and > java-runtime or java-runtime-headless as

Re: openjdk-9: FYI: Swing generics changes

Hi, thanks for your continued analysis of the Java 9 situation. Am 23.08.2017 um 00:42 schrieb Chris West: [...] > This really doesn't feel like the kind of thing we should patch, and is > rather ugly to fix in each package (although essentially simple). Sadness. :( Agreed. Ok, it's too late now

Re: Why dependency on both default-jre and java-runtime

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Carnë Draug wrote: > However, java-runtime packages are virtual packages provided by > default-jre so I don't understand why. Could anyone clarify? They are also provided by openjdk-*-jre, so you can, for example, install a package depending on java6-runtime on wheezy (pre-L