Re: PDFBox 2.0.6

2017-07-01 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:29:55PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:54:00 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > I dropped the libjempbox-java package because it is no longer > > unsupported and was removed upstream. Apparently xmpbox is the successor > > but I don't know if we

Re: PDFBox 2.0.6

2017-07-01 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 01.07.2017 um 17:26 schrieb tony mancill: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:29:55PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:54:00 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> >>> I dropped the libjempbox-java package because it is no longer >>> unsupported and was removed upstream. Apparently xmp

Re: PDFBox 2.0.6

2017-07-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:14:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >>> do we still have to do this > >>> search&replace dance in debian/rules? > >> You mean the cmap copying back and forth? > >> Probably not (see below). > >> And it looks like the whole repackaging needs an update: > > Yes, I suspect it

Re: PDFBox 2.0.6

2017-07-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
>I can live with another package (that means there are eight new >dependencies for pdfsam at the moment). Then I go for >src:libpdfbox2-java and drop the libjempbox-java binary package for >this >source package. I recommend creating a libpdfbox1-java package instead, otherwise we'll be forced