Re: squeeze update of libapache-mod-jk?

2015-06-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015, Markus Koschany wrote: > > I see that you requested sponsorship. Shall I go ahead and upload it and > > send the DLA? Or do you prefer to handle the DLA yourself? > > please go ahead. Thank you. Uploaded and DLA sent. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support D

Re: maven-compiler-plugin 3.x

2015-06-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
It looks like we have some issues left with the maven-compiler-plugin 3.x. The pom in libmaven-compiler-plugin-java/3.2-3 refers to plexus-compiler 2.x, but the package depends on libplexus-compiler-java which is satisfied by libplexus-compiler-1.0-java. So a package depending on maven-compiler-plu

Re: maven-compiler-plugin 3.x

2015-06-10 Thread Markus Koschany
On 10.06.2015 14:21, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > It looks like we have some issues left with the maven-compiler-plugin > 3.x. I reported this issue here: https://bugs.debian.org/787199 It is probably sufficient to add a versioned dependency on libplexus-compiler-java (>= 2.4) but I would also take a

Re: maven-compiler-plugin 3.x

2015-06-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/06/2015 14:48, Markus Koschany a écrit : > It is probably sufficient to add a versioned dependency on > libplexus-compiler-java (>= 2.4) but I would also take a closer look at > the Provides field. I don't know if a versioned dependency will work. If libplexus-compiler-java is now considere

Re: maven-compiler-plugin 3.x

2015-06-10 Thread tony mancill
On 06/10/2015 05:54 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 10/06/2015 14:48, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> It is probably sufficient to add a versioned dependency on >> libplexus-compiler-java (>= 2.4) but I would also take a closer look at >> the Provides field. > > I don't know if a versioned dependen

Re: maven-compiler-plugin 3.x

2015-06-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/06/2015 15:18, tony mancill a écrit : > I haven't tried this yet, but it appears that dpkg added versioned > support for virtual packages to unstable last August Thanks, this is very interesting. That means we could stop the proliferation of java-runtime virtual packages and replace them wi

Re: maven-compiler-plugin 3.x

2015-06-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:30:31 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I haven't tried this yet, but it appears that dpkg added versioned > > support for virtual packages to unstable last August > Thanks, this is very interesting. That means we could stop the > proliferation of java-runtime virtual package

Re: packaging java applications: questions from a newbie

2015-06-10 Thread Guillaume Turri
Hi, 2015-06-08 8:42 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Turri : > 2015-06-08 3:15 GMT+02:00 tony mancill : >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> I took a look at your aXMLRPC package, and it does appear to be creating >> the necessary maven artifacts and installing them into the right places, >> so I suspect that mh_make is fai

Re: packaging java applications: questions from a newbie

2015-06-10 Thread tony mancill
On 06/10/2015 10:15 PM, Guillaume Turri wrote: > Actually I found what was wrong: it seemed to be an issue with case. > When I change my debian/libaxmlrpc-java.poms like this > > -pom.xml --usj-name=aXMLRPC > +pom.xml --usj-name=axmlrpc > > then it works just fine. Ah, nice catch. That