Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-07-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Matthias, I have a question regarding this point, why do you want to > preserve the support for squeeze? Considering that openjdk-7 hasn't been > backported to this release, do you think it's worth keeping this Maybe the backport was not uploaded… b

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-07-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 23/07/2014 10:04, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > Maybe the backport was not uploaded… but I built openjdk-7 for > squeeze and lenny in our company myself, from sid sources, and > am very glad Matthias still supports older releases like this. Thank you for the feedback Thorsten. Do you still build

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-07-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Thank you for the feedback Thorsten. Do you still build openjdk-7 for > lenny today, or did you migrate to more recent releases? I still do, we have existing contracts where lenny is the validation system (in fact, I recently had to install a fresh one

Re: Planning to remove wsdl2c.

2014-07-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 23/07/2014 07:37, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Please let me know if somebody wants to keep wsdl2c in Debian, otherwise I > will > file a request for removal. Hi Charles, Is there any hope to see the packaging effort for Eucalyptus resumed? If so I think it doesn't harm to keep wsdl2c a bit lo