On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:20:32 +0100, Adam Spragg wrote:
> Well, thanks for all the help, but now I'm stuck on step the 9th, trying to
> compile SignApk.java. And I think I'm just going to give up.
>
> I'm getting compile errors of the form:
>
> SignApk.java:20: error: cannot find symbol
> im
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 16/07/2014 00:07, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>
> > This is nonsense. Not yet - not as long we want/need gcj (on some archs).
>
> Fair enough. But we already have a lot of packages incompatible with gcj
> in Jessie.
Ugh. If you have time, can you wor
On Wednesday 16 Jul 2014 08:28:33 gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:20:32 +0100, Adam Spragg wrote:
> > Well, thanks for all the help, but now I'm stuck on step the 9th, trying
> > to compile SignApk.java. And I think I'm just going to give up.
> >
> > I'm getting compile errors of t
On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>> This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports
>> source/target level 1.5:
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html
>>
>> So if you update a package a
Le 15/07/2014 17:27, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Even before you did start, I was telling you on irc that I'll keep the
> openjdk-8
> package as one package, and not splitting it up into different source packages
> depending on the hotspot version specific for that architecture. You did
> continue
Le 16/07/2014 09:41, Adam Spragg a écrit :
> ABI-incompatible changes without bumping the major version number? And people
> *use* software from upstreams who work in this way?
Unfortunately the BouncyCastle project is known for badly breaking the
compatibility between releases, and this is an i
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:24:52AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 16/07/2014 00:07, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>
> > This is nonsense. Not yet - not as long we want/need gcj (on some archs).
>
> Fair enough. But we already have a lot of packages incompatible with gcj
> in Jessie.
Bad, but other
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014 um 09:50 Uhr
> Von: "Sylvestre Ledru"
> An: "Matthias Klose" , "Emmanuel Bourg" ,
> "Debian Java"
> Cc: "debian-de...@lists.debian.org" , "Debian
> Release"
> Betreff: Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5
>
> On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthia
On 16.07.2014 07:54, tony mancill wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 03:56 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here is the second part of the felix-* update. I updated felix-framework
>> to version 4.4.0 and I'm looking for a sponsor now.
[...]
> Uploaded.
>
> Cheers,
> tony
Thank you tony!
signat
Le 16/07/2014 11:24, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> Bad, but other packages broken is not a reason to break more.
>
> *any* Java application which is built on/for kfreebsd-* (which has native
> stuff) or _all (where it's available on kfreebsd-*, too)
I understand that would be ideal but that's unrea
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:39:33PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 11:30 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:57:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >> Le 15/07/2014 16:22, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Could you please write the definition for each of them, and
Source: basex
Version: 7.8.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Usertags: openjdk-8-transition
Hi,
During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8,
this package failed to build with the following error:
[INFO]
--
Package: proguard
Version: 4.11-1
Severity: important
User: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Usertags: openjdk-8-transition
proguard is unable to process the bytecode produced by Java 8. This
breaks the build of the mobile-atlas-creator package with OpenJDK 8:
http://87.98.165.193/debian/openjdk8-reb
Source: gluegen2
Version: 2.1.5-2
Severity: important
User: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Usertags: openjdk-8-transition
Hi,
During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8,
this package failed to build with the following error:
java.build:
[echo] - - - compiling all ja
Hi all,
I updated the mvel package to fix a build failure with Java 8 and I'm
looking for a sponsor to upload it.
Here is the changelog:
* Fixed a compilation error with Java 8
* Fixed the OptimizerFactory class and the unit tests to work with the
system version of ASM
* Added d/maven.igno
On Wednesday 16 Jul 2014 09:23:57 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Bugs-nuts insane. Fricking Java, man.
>
> This has nothing to do with Java. Upstream should have provided a proper
> build script, try asking them. With Maven, Ant, or Gradle you dot not
> have to care about the dependencies and the javac
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:49:06AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/07/2014 03:53, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
>
> > openjfx is FTBFS due to a missing dependency on antlr3.
>
> Thank you for spotting this issue Miguel. I think I got caught by a
> dependency caching mechanism in Gradle, I had an
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:23:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I updated the mvel package to fix a build failure with Java 8 and I'm
> looking for a sponsor to upload it.
>
I'll take care of it.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:50:46AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
> I think that is unfair statement against Emmanuel (especially when
> adding d-d & d-r to the cc list).
Totally agree with Sylvestre on this.
I also have sponsored many packages for Emmanuel in the Java team.
Frankly, I don't g
Hi,
I intend to package imeji[1] in Debian Science team. Unfortunately I'm
not that skilled with Java packaging. For maven based packages I found
MavenBuilder[2] but this page looks quite outdated refering to
debhelper (>= 5), cdbs, openjdk-6-jdk
which lloks somehow ancient. I wonder if so
Le 16/07/2014 22:34, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Any hint would be really welcome.
Hi Andreas,
When dealing with a Maven project you "just" have to checkout the code
and run mh_make. If all goes well this will create the packaging files
and match the dependencies with the Debian packages.
I took
Hi Emmanuel,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 , Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> When dealing with a Maven project you "just" have to checkout the code
> and run mh_make. If all goes well this will create the packaging files
> and match the dependencies with the Debian packages.
I checked this and was stumbling upon
22 matches
Mail list logo
