Hello,
after having packaged freemind in 2004 and freeplane in 2010, as well as
a fair amount of Java libraries for dependency reasons, I've handed over
these two packages in 2013, and haven't done much since my two packages
have been replaced by two kids and a new job with more travel.
Henc
ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de writes:
> Hello,
hi Eric,
> after having packaged freemind in 2004 and freeplane in 2010, as well as a
> fair amount of Java libraries for dependency reasons, I've handed over
> these two packages in 2013, and haven't done much since my two packages
> have been rep
On 07/06/2014 07:36 AM, ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after having packaged freemind in 2004 and freeplane in 2010, as well as
> a fair amount of Java libraries for dependency reasons, I've handed over
> these two packages in 2013, and haven't done much since my two packages
>
Am 06.07.2014 19:06, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Gabriele Giacone, le Sat 05 Jul 2014 03:41:09 +0200, a écrit :
>> It FTBFS on hurd
>>
>> [...]
>> cd /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc && /usr/bin/javadoc -quiet -d
>> /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc/html/javadoc/
>> /home/user/p
On 07/06/2014 10:45 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 06.07.2014 19:06, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> Gabriele Giacone, le Sat 05 Jul 2014 03:41:09 +0200, a écrit :
>>> It FTBFS on hurd
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> cd /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc && /usr/bin/javadoc -quiet -d
>>> /home/user/port/sim
Hi all,
I prepared an update of the jftp package and I'm looking for a sponsor
to upload it.
Here is the changelog:
* debian/control:
- Depend on default-jre instead of openjdk-6-jre (Closes: #753786)
- Standards-Version updated to 3.9.5 (no changes)
- Use canonical URLs for the Vc
Le 06/07/2014 19:45, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> maybe uploaded class files built with java8.
I don't think so, this would be caught by Lintian:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/incompatible-java-bytecode-format.html
Currently no package contains classes using the format 52 (Java 8).
Emmanuel Bou
Hi Emmanuel,
I just uploaded.
Many thanks
Steffen
> Gesendet: Montag, 07. Juli 2014 um 00:43 Uhr
> Von: "Emmanuel Bourg"
> An: "Debian Java"
> Betreff: RFS: jftp/1.52+dfsg-3
>
> Hi all,
>
> I prepared an update of the jftp package and I'm looking for a sponsor
> to upload it.
>
> Here is th
Hey guys,
What kind of artifacts would Java projects consider non-free? More
specifically, what are examples of some of the things that you would
remove from an orig.tar which would be inappropriate for a deb package
because of licensing, etc? I know jars are one example, but are there
others? Fai
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Andrew Schurman wrote:
> What kind of artifacts would Java projects consider non-free?
Anything that is under a non-free license or is missing the preferred
form for modification (aka source).
> specifically, what are examples of some of the things that you would
Le 07/07/2014 01:37, "Steffen Möller" a écrit :
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> I just uploaded.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Steffen
Thank you Steffen, I tagged the repository accordingly.
Emmanuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
11 matches
Mail list logo